The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The pie charts give information about the changing in retail online shopping sales in Canada from 2005 to 2010.
In general, the total percentage of Electronics and Appliance accompanied with Food and Beverage accounted for the largest proportion of sales in 5 years. The figure of Home furnishings as well as Electronics and Appliance decreased while those of the remained categories went up in the same period.
In 2005, the online sales of Electronics and Appliance was the highest of 35%, which was followed by Home Furnishing with 25%. In 2010, the figure of Electronics and Appliance slightly declined to 30% while these of Home Furnishing dramatically dropped to 15%.
The data of Food and Beverage rank third in 2005 with 22%. This number then significantly rose up and accounted for the largest proportion of 32% in 2010. Likewise, the percentage of Video games also moderately increased from 18% in 2005 to 23% in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-22 | dolzoo | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | thanhthanh211 | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-24 | fachryadul92 | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-24 | fachryadul92 | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-16 | saadipk90@yahoo.com | 89 | view |
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 67
- places where people gain access to the Internet between 1998 and 2004 67
- The chart below shows the percentage of films produced by 5 different countries in 3 years 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of female members of parliament in 5 Europe countries from 2000 to 2012 77
- Expenditure on fast foods by income groups, UK 1990 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, likewise, so, then, third, well, while, in general, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 786.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07096774194 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84768376221 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535483870968 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.0707649538 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.25 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186048228987 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0895646758439 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11418602415 0.0843802449381 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14694146332 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.139086210907 0.0819641961636 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.