US spending patterns between 1996 and 1996
The pie chart given below illustrate the us financing patterns between 1966 and 1996. Overall, it can be seen that the most positive movement US expending kind is cars and the most rapid decreased sold during three years was food pattern. It is measured in percentage
From 1996, food patterns was highest us financing patterns reach 44 % and the car win out second US financing sector with 23 %. But there was alteration in thirty year period. Cars selling sector indicated a big boom from 23 % to 45 % between 1966 and 1996 and food patterns decreased considerably from 44 % to 14 % between 1966 and 1996. The second a peak pattern was computer which just sold out 1 % in equal year but climb gradually from 1 % to 10 %. And restaurants sector grow half from 7% to 14 % thirty years afterwords
In 1996, books patterns refered an enormous declined from 6% to 1%. There was substantial failed in US spending patterns along thirty years. While furniture sectors described 2% of reduce slightly, from 10% to 8 %. And out of four pattern dipped, petrolite was almost stable but not obtained hold out so has dramatic declined from 9% to 8 %
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-11 | eva2106 | 78 | view |
| 2020-12-15 | Arshdeepmondair | 100 | view |
| 2020-12-15 | Arshdeepmondair | view | |
| 2020-03-13 | destrarastra | 67 | view |
| 2020-03-13 | Fuad Allatif | 73 | view |
- Average CO2 Emissions per person in the Uk, sweden, italy and portugal between 1967 and 2007 73
- Some people believe that school children should not be given homework by their teachers, whereas others argue that homewrok plays an important role in the education of children 73
- C02 emissions for different forms of transport in thr european union 73
- The figures for imprinsonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980 67
- Three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular uk school in 1981, 1991 and 2001 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 232, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'pattern' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'patterns'.
Suggestion: patterns
...ghtly, from 10% to 8 %. And out of four pattern dipped, petrolite was almost stable but...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 936.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77551020408 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55675228533 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59693877551 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.3746111092 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.6 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.2 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.369498109164 0.215688989381 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153101400403 0.103423049105 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133571851731 0.0843802449381 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.26587029229 0.15604864568 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0252061901462 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.