The use of corporal punishment (physically hitting students) in schools is in decline, yet it should be used to improve behaviour.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
In this day and age, the presence of corporal punishment in schools is not as frequent as before, in which opinions diverge on whether schools should take advantage of applying this form of penalty on students to control their conduct. Although some fervently advocate this sentiment, I am at loggerheads owing to a handful of rational reasons.
Admittedly, serious physical and psychological hurts are attributed to corporal punishment application in formal schooling. To be more accurate, serious injuries, including severe muscle harm, extensive bruising and even worstly damaged internal organs or brain, are potential repercussions of this violent practice. Additionally, whips leave long-term psychology obsessions in lieu of lessons. An invisible fear is able to be formed vaguely in a student's memory to hinder them from repeating inappropriate behaviors, which is an association of the teacher’s presence who fines them. However, it does not signify that children themselves decide what to do relying on comprehending the moral aspect of their behaviours. This suggests that instead of guiding pupils to be aware of good characters as a part of educational mission, physical hitting in schools just only turns them to “conditional reaction creatures”.
Further and even more prominently, corporal punishment in schools is likely to receive abominable criticism from media and parents, which exerts an adverse effect on the educational system’s reputation. First, formidable censure from overprotective parents is unavoidable when they witness their kids being hit. Moreover, numerous adults could not suppress their anger and therefore, become overaggressive, which leads to serious responses like insults and even assaults to their children’s teachers. Second, the overwhelming of social media popularity gives corporal punishment a relatively dirty look. This can be explained by the fact that, regardless of teaching purpose as well as mild physical impacts, corporal punishment to some extent under media perspective is likely to be overexaggerated and distorted with the aim of attracting views from audiences. Therefore, schools and the education system have to suffer from abysmal public’s criticism. As a result, the relationship between parents and schools as well as the education image might be destroyed heavily.
By way of conclusion, notwithstanding the temporary advantage, I ascertain that the physical punishment should be radically eliminated out of schools.
- The use of corporal punishment physically hitting students in schools is in decline yet it should be used to improve behaviour To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The diagram gives information about the process of making carbonated drinks Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 78
- The aging population is good for business the economy and society Others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Some people think spoken communication is more powerful than written communication To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The diagram shows how instant noodles are manufactured Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 447, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
... fear is able to be formed vaguely in a students memory to hinder them from repeating in...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, moreover, second, so, therefore, well, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 23.0 5.60731707317 410% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 33.7804878049 166% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 3.97073170732 378% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2131.0 965.302439024 221% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 370.0 196.424390244 188% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.75945945946 4.92477711251 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 3.73543355544 117% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20413926044 2.65546596893 121% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 106.607317073 215% => Less unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.618918918919 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 654.3 283.868780488 230% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2276581652 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.1875 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8125 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 1.13902439024 1054% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245363333106 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0718820626139 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515260842512 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145571249711 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0141066075714 0.0819641961636 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 61.2550243902 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 11.4140731707 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.84 8.06136585366 134% => OK
difficult_words: 142.0 40.7170731707 349% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.