Visitors in England
The chart illustrates the proportion of visitors to England who went to 4 different destinations in Brighton between 1980 and 2010. Overall, the rate of tourists to Pier and Pavilion witnessed an upward trend, as opposed to the data for the other 2 tourist attractions. Additionally, Pavilion became the most popular attraction from 1990 onwards, with the figure peaking at 1995.
In 1980, the percentage of visitors to England went to Pier, standing at 10%. Despite some fluctuations, this figure climbed from 12% in 2000 to 22% in 2010. Meanwhile, the proportion visiting the Pavilion made up nearly 25% in 1980, before a sharp ascent to reach a record – high of 50% was seen in this data in 1995. Then, this figure decreased markable to 30% in 2010.
In terms of other 2 regions, 30% was exhibited in the percentage of tourists to England went to Festival in 1980, fell slightly to reach 15% after 15 years later, before increasing to reach a plateau at 28% from 2000 to 2010. Meanwhile, the rate of visitors to the Art Gallery, starting at 21% in 1980 and there was a sharp rise to 37% in this data in 1987. This figure, in turn, witnessed a considerable descent to 20% in 1990. Finally, the rate visiting the Art Gallery hit a record – low of below 10% after 20 years later.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-08 | Trần Khiết Băng | 100 | view |
| 2023-01-27 | hoang tuan minh | 67 | view |
| 2023-01-27 | hoang tuan minh | 67 | view |
| 2023-01-27 | hoang tuan minh | 67 | view |
| 2023-01-27 | hoang tuan minh | 67 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 33.7804878049 169% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1059.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62445414847 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64578374427 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519650655022 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0596596912 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2727272727 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8181818182 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.54545454545 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168719368521 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748088480051 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122584707764 0.0843802449381 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129007249561 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0179848530872 0.0819641961636 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.