The line graph gives information about the volume of using water around the world in three different categories between 1900 and 2000, while the table illustrates the amount of water consumed in two different countries in 2000.
To begin with, it can be clearly seen that use for agriculture grew substantially from 500 km3 1900 to 2000, furthermore at the end of the period five times higher compared to the beginning. Although industrial and domestic use started at the same point, and almost remained stable in the first 50 years of the given time, industrial usage rose slightly to 1000 km3, domestic use had a gentle increment around 200 km3 until the 2000s.
To continue with when it comes to Brazil and Congo, Brazil’s population is approximately 33 times higher than Congo's, therefore the amount of land degraded is sharply different 26500 and 100 km2, respectively. Moreover, depending on the land degraded there is also significant variation in water consumption, while an average Brazilian consumes 359 m3, a Congolese citizen just uses 8m3 per year.
In conclusion, it is understood from the first graph that agricultural consumption had always the highest share, however, the other two types increased in the last 50 years. According to the table, in the given criteria there is a huge difference between Brazil and Congo.
- the chart below shows the percentage of adults of different age groups in the UK who used internet everyday from 2003 2006 78
- The chart below shows the expenditure on three categories among different age groups of residents in the UK in 2004 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graphs below show the types of music albums purchased by people in Britain according to sex and age Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below
- The chart below shows the aid from six developed countries to developing countries from 2008 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The chart below gives information about global sales of games software CDs and DVD or video 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1127.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12272727273 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77977866412 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 106.607317073 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640909090909 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 333.0 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.7320225455 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.0 112.824112599 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.4285714286 22.9334400587 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.1428571429 5.23603664747 270% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260635309863 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108106107368 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.144790771283 0.0843802449381 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167359208668 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.167654960366 0.0819641961636 205% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.2329268293 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.01 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.