World Population by Region, 1900 and 2000
The two pie charts present a comparison of the years 1900 and 2000 world population in different regions including Asia Pacific, Europe, North America and Caribbean, Middle East and North Africa, and in addition to those are other regions not specifically mentioned.
Overall, some regions presented changes in their population while some remained unchanged.
Asia Pacific and Europe both had a decline in number of residents from year 1900 to 2000, even though they seemed to be the top two regions which had the most occupants for both years presented, reducing 6% and 11% less people respectively. Africa and Latin America on the other hand both had population growth of about 2 to 3 times their figure over a century. Moreover, North America had maintained its percentage of inhabitants representing 5% of the total world population after 100 years. The rest of the world which accounted for 3% of the total number also remained unchanged. Interestingly, Middle East and North Africa which are not included in 1900's population statistics appeared as 6% of the 6 billion people on year 2000.
Taking everything into account, it is shown on the diagrams that the population has remarkably grown about four times in a period of 100 years - from just 1.6 billion to 6 billion people, with Asia Pacific accounting for more than half of the total world population over the century.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-23 | Adp_15 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | an mai hương | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-19 | dorae | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-09 | Alena.222 | 56 | view |
| 2023-06-11 | taocute.s1 | 56 | view |
- The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton. 56
- Visitors to a Local Cinema According to Age 73
- Comparison of Energy Production The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in 2 years 92
- Number of Students in a Kaplan International College in the UK in 2009 56
- World Population by Region 1900 and 2000 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 652, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1900s'.
Suggestion: in the 1900s
...and North Africa which are not included in 1900s population statistics appeared as 6% of...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1159.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06113537118 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71946355769 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563318777293 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 347.4 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.3781511937 43.030603864 173% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.875 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.625 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353231486433 0.215688989381 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145962176348 0.103423049105 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0835736025617 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218543854215 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0912009306731 0.0819641961636 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.66 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.