You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The diagrams below show stages in the development of simple cooking equipment.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
You should write at least 150 words.
The given picture illustrates the different appearances of cooking instrument into three segments.
Stage A is a simple pitcher like product which is made out of stone and can be decorated on the outside. It is narrower at the base and at the opening but gets broader at middle.
The second stage, stage B, is quite smaller than the the previous one. It is more bowl like in appearance. The bowl is constructed of only clay as a shield and has a small hatch like opening on the side that allows ash to be pulled out.
Stage C is more complicated than its ancestors as it is modern. It is a stove-like equipment with narrow hip which get s broader at both the head and the ending. At the top lies three support panel for holding the pot. Beneath it, there is a grate where charcoal can be put before using. The insides consists of clay linings. There is a small door right above the baseline which opens up a chamber that allows air to enter and the user to remove ash. Finally, on the outside there is a handle that can be used to transport the oven.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-28 | levanhoan123 | view | |
| 2022-07-28 | levanhoan123 | view | |
| 2022-07-28 | levanhoan123 | view | |
| 2022-03-13 | namviet | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-18 | Khanhu010101 | 78 | view |
- Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar which causes many health problems Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar Do you agree or disagree 56
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summerise and
- The diagrams below show the development of the horse over a period of 40 million years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graphs below show the enrolments of overseas students and local students in Australian universities over a ten year period Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at l 11
- Failure is proof that the desire wasn t strong enough To what extent do you agree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 50, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...d stage, stage B, is quite smaller than the the previous one. It is more bowl like in a...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 50, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...d stage, stage B, is quite smaller than the the previous one. It is more bowl like in a...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 193, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'panel' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'panels'.
Suggestion: panels
...e ending. At the top lies three support panel for holding the pot. Beneath it, there ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 301, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'consist'.
Suggestion: consist
...al can be put before using. The insides consists of clay linings. There is a small door ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, second
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 862.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.35353535354 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37304954574 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.4970672217 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 66.3076923077 112.824112599 59% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 15.2307692308 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.84615384615 5.23603664747 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.081650818739 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0276799316712 0.103423049105 27% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0258237878029 0.0843802449381 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.050660260951 0.15604864568 32% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0255783976224 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.7 13.2329268293 51% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.36 11.4140731707 64% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.