The diagrams below show stages in the development of simple cooking equipment Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The diagrams below show stages in the development of simple cooking equipment.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The flow chart depicts the refurbishements of cooking equipment. Overall, it is noticeable that the developements of cooking device experienced 3 most essential stages. Beginning with the fundamental device for ancient people and ending in the more complicated tool.

At the first, the cooking equipment consisted of only some basiccal stones to balanced the pot. And the fire there were created by some grass and dry twigs. Howerver, in the next stage, the stones were replaced by a clay shield supporting for the pot. It was used to decrease the lost of energy and prevented the effect of wind - which can extinguish fire.

In the final stage, the source of fire was charcoal, and there was a grate for them surrounding by a clay lining. The pot would laid on the supporting devices. Below them, the clay shield was restored by metal to limit the amount of escaping energy. There was also a door for the gas exchange where ash was discharged and took in air.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-07-28 levanhoan123 view
2022-07-28 levanhoan123 view
2022-07-28 levanhoan123 view
2022-03-13 namviet 78 view
2021-10-18 Khanhu010101 78 view
Essays by user namviet :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 129, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'lay'
Suggestion: lay
...ounding by a clay lining. The pot would laid on the supporting devices. Below them, ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 800.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81927710843 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6693291715 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60843373494 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.1395954722 43.030603864 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 72.7272727273 112.824112599 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0909090909 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.36363636364 5.23603664747 26% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0871866121145 0.215688989381 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0322916314658 0.103423049105 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0295528673445 0.0843802449381 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0564805605626 0.15604864568 36% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0100892809679 0.0819641961636 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.08 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.