You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The table describes the changes of people who went for international travel in 1990, 1995, 2000 and 2005. (Million).
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The table illustrates the number of people going on international travel from 1990 to 2005.
Overall, it is clear that the number of international visitors to America decreased, but the opposite was true of the figures for the remaining regions. Besides, Europe recorded the highest number of folks traveling abroad over the period shown.
In 1990, Europe ranked first in the number of oversea sightseers with 280,2 million, followed by America at 80,5 million. The figure for America was 20,3 million higher than that of Asia and the Pacific and about four times that of Africa. Only 9,8 million foreigners victors chose the Middle East as favorable destination, which was the lowest figure.
In 1995, while the quantity of international tourists to Europe rose gradually and still took dominance with its figure reaching a record high of 390,3 million, the figure for America experienced a slight decline to 113.2 at the end of the period. In comparison, after a considerable increase for the first 10 years by over 8, 5 million, the figure for oversea backpackers to Africa slightly went up to 28.7 million to end to the period. Similarly, the figure for the Middle East climbed marginally by 3, 7 million, and continued to increase to 15, 8 million in 2005.
Strikingly, only in 2000 was almost the same data recorded in America and Asia and the Pacific.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-26 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-26 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
- The charts below show the percentages of the water used in different sectors in Sydney Australia in 1997 and 2007 73
- We can derive knowledge from the news but some people think we can t trust journalists What do you think What qualities do you think a successful journalist should have Give a reason for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledg 87
- Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give 33
- Some people think that it is more effective for students to study in a group while others believe that it is better for them to study alone Discuss both views and give your own opinion 87
- Nowadays some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they are looking for new employees Why is that Is it a positive or negative development 92
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, similarly, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1136.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96069868996 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68216133664 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558951965066 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 345.6 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1343823551 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.6 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186895550441 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0831100859223 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557842836131 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109793337703 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0660952534726 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.