The bar chart below gives information about vehicle ownership in China.
The given bar graph provides a comparison of mass car ownership in China over 12-year period.
From an overall perspective, it is conspicuous that the volume of people using their own vehicle for transportation had experienced an upward trend and witnessed the dramatical upsurge after 12 years.
According to the data in the beginning year, the amount of people had their own car were merely 250 thousand people and made a twofold jump after 2 years. Although the number of personal vehicles was substantial raise to nearly 900 thousand people in 1991, its number remained same position during 2 years after that. Subsequently, the volume of Chinese vehicle ownership was roughly more than 2 times when compared with the two previous year, with the recorded volume was 2000 thousand of people.
Moving to the remaining year, the number of personal vehicle witnessed an intensive growth from 1995 to 1997, with increase by 1000 thousand people. Consequently, the recorded number reached peak in 1999, with the recorded volume accounted for more than 4000 thousand of people. It is obvious that the period from 1987 to 1999 saw an upsurge in the number of under 500 to more than 4000 thousand Chinese people had their own car.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-10 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view |
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football But others think taking part in individual sports is better like swimming Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Large companies use sport events to promote their products Some people think this has a negative impact on sports To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The diagram below shows how ethanol fuel is produced from corn 92
- The line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in China between 1982 and 2006 67
- The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compar 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1030.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0243902439 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57261466654 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541463414634 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.9309100263 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.75 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.625 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0791030192199 0.215688989381 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0429023999536 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508870050536 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0678349619801 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0565184584043 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.