The chart below compares the age structure of the population of France and India in 1984
The chart compares the age structure of the population of two countries namely India and France by gender. Overall, the population of India had a significant larger number of people aged from 0 to 20 than France, while French elderly inhabitants outnumbered those of India.
It is clear that the Indian population had far more people aged between 0 and 20 than its counterpart. In India, the 0-20 age cohort accounted for approximately 50% of the population, dominating the country’s population. By contrast, French population is more evenly distributed across the age ranges, with each five-year age bracket consituting of roughly 7% to 8% percentage of the population. It is noticable that France was populated by a significant number of people aged 50 upwards. The figure for this age group of France was 38% of the population, while the corresponding figure for India was a neglible 17%.
As is observed from the data, India’s population was more equally distributed by gender than France’s. French female ‘ proprtion slightly exceeded its male number by 10% of the population, while there is no discernible difference between the two equivalent figures for India.
- The chart below compares the age structure of the population of France and India in 1984 78
- The table below shows the results of survey in 2000 2005 and 2010 about one university 78
- The chart shows how dangerous waste products are dealth with in three countries 78
- The table gives information about the underground railwway system in six cities 84
- The chart below shows the percentage of monthly household income spent on various items by two diferent groups in one European country 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.48453608247 120% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 5.05154639175 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 32.9175257732 24% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 26.3917525773 99% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.85567010309 311% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 991.0 937.175257732 106% => OK
No of words: 190.0 206.0 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21578947368 4.54256449028 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.78020617076 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06126275251 2.54303337028 120% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 127.690721649 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547368421053 0.622605031667 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 308.7 290.88556701 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 4.0 0.824742268041 485% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.83505154639 218% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6804123711 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 16.3608247423 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 31.0487470175 44.8134815571 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.111111111 76.5299724578 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1111111111 16.8248392259 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.55555555556 4.34317383033 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.29896907216 70% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 7.41237113402 40% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.49484536082 134% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345828922163 0.216113520407 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.173719583482 0.0766984524023 226% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139171330569 0.0603063233224 231% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262558400035 0.12726935374 206% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12283032748 0.0580467560999 212% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 8.37731958763 164% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 70.7449484536 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 3.82989690722 292% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 7.45979381443 154% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 8.71597938144 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 7.59969072165 116% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 41.2886597938 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 8.62886597938 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 8.54432989691 122% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 8.15463917526 159% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.