The chart below shows the percentage of monthly household income spent on various items by two diferent groups in one European country.
The chart compares how two groups with different incomes in an European country distributed their earnings to various items on a monthly basis. Overall, the low-icome group spent the most on digestibles and fuel, while recreational activies and miscellanous constitue of a significant part of the high-income group’s expenses.
As is observed from the data, the low-income group spent a remarkable proportion of their wages on cosmetibles and fuel, 29% and 24% respectively. In total, the two accounted for a half of the group’s monthly expenses. By contrast, the high-income group spent relatively little on these two categories. Fiftten percent of this group’s income was spent on victuals, and a negligible 7% on fuel. It was noticable that the people who earned more allocated a large amount to recreational and cultural activities, 21% of their earnings, in proprotion to 10% by the low-income group. Likewise, there was a 8% discrepancy between the wealthier’s expenditure on restaurant and hotels and that of people with a tighter budget.
A striking similarity is both two group spent a remarked amount on miscellanous things, approximately 20% of their income A moderate amount of income was spent on transpotation by both the high earners and the less productive ones , 16% and 9% respectively. They also allocated a similarly miniscule percentage, below 8% to clothing.
- The chart below compares the age structure of the population of France and India in 1984 78
- The chart shows how dangerous waste products are dealth with in three countries 78
- The table gives information about the underground railwway system in six cities 84
- The chart below shows the percentage of monthly household income spent on various items by two diferent groups in one European country 84
- The table below shows the results of survey in 2000 2005 and 2010 about one university 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 61, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ow two groups with different incomes in an European country distributed their earn...
^^
Line 2, column 548, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 21% of their earnings, in proprotion to 10% by the low-income group. Likewise, t...
^^
Line 2, column 599, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...e low-income group. Likewise, there was a 8% discrepancy between the wealthier’s ...
^
Line 3, column 231, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...igh earners and the less productive ones , 16% and 9% respectively. They also allo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, likewise, similarly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.48453608247 80% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 5.05154639175 198% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 32.9175257732 30% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 26.3917525773 125% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.85567010309 78% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1173.0 937.175257732 125% => OK
No of words: 219.0 206.0 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35616438356 4.54256449028 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.78020617076 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24779327498 2.54303337028 128% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 127.690721649 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575342465753 0.622605031667 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 354.6 290.88556701 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 6.0 0.824742268041 728% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6804123711 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 16.3608247423 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.4141826139 44.8134815571 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.3 76.5299724578 153% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9 16.8248392259 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 4.34317383033 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.29896907216 70% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 2.54639175258 157% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 7.41237113402 40% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.94845360825 177% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338158275248 0.216113520407 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13584002377 0.0766984524023 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0949697070769 0.0603063233224 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238992673631 0.12726935374 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0695998259375 0.0580467560999 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 8.37731958763 177% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 70.7449484536 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 3.82989690722 292% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 7.45979381443 154% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 8.71597938144 158% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 7.59969072165 122% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 41.2886597938 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 8.62886597938 139% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 8.54432989691 122% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 8.15463917526 147% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.