The chart below gives information about how people aged 25-34 are housed in the UK.
The chart provides information about home owners or renters in the UK over 11 years period starting in 2004.
Overall, it can be seen that home owners were always higher than renters, except in 2013 and 2014, and that in 2004 and 2014 the percent of people who are home owners and renters respectively by far the largest.
Looking at the first data set, on owners of houses, in more detail, it is evident that percent of people who are home owners in 2004 was the highest, nearly 60% and from that the percent of home owners all fell in range to over 35% in 2014, except in 2007, which was slightly higher than year 2006.
Turning to the data set on house rent people, it can be seen that the percent of renters is the opposite to home owners. From 2004 to 2014 the percent of people who are renter were all rose in range of 20% to over 45% except in two years 2006 and 2012 which were slightly lower than two previous years 2005 and 2011 respectively.
- The chart below gives information about how people aged 25-34 are housed in the UK. 73
- The chart and graph below give information about participants who have entered the Olympics since it began 77
- Organising a large family celebration such as a wedding can often create problems What can be the problems associated with organising a large family event and what solutions can you suggest 73
- The diagram illustrates the process of lithography a method used for printing newspapers 88
- Many students choose to take a gap year before starting university, to travel or gain work experience. Do you think this is a good idea or a waste of time 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 162, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...From 2004 to 2014 the percent of people who are renter were all rose in range of 20% to...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, look
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.48453608247 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 4.92783505155 41% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 5.05154639175 158% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.03092783505 330% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 32.9175257732 24% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 26.3917525773 140% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.85567010309 26% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 791.0 937.175257732 84% => OK
No of words: 180.0 206.0 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.39444444444 4.54256449028 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.78020617076 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.04139264979 2.54303337028 80% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 127.690721649 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488888888889 0.622605031667 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 218.7 290.88556701 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.41237113402 85% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.13402061856 33% => OK
Article: 1.0 0.824742268041 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 1.44329896907 346% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 12.6804123711 39% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 16.3608247423 220% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.3512797286 44.8134815571 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.2 76.5299724578 207% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 36.0 16.8248392259 214% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.2 4.34317383033 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 7.41237113402 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0768768455329 0.216113520407 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059621653637 0.0766984524023 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627518573308 0.0603063233224 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.068589263781 0.12726935374 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0673132179075 0.0580467560999 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 8.37731958763 205% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.78 70.7449484536 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 7.45979381443 169% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.77 8.71597938144 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 7.59969072165 103% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 41.2886597938 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 8.62886597938 203% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 16.4 8.54432989691 192% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 8.15463917526 221% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.