The chart below shows the amount of time that 10 to 15-year-olds spend chatting on the Internet and playing on games consoles on an average school day in the UK.
The bar graph compares how much time that britain teenagers spend on online chatting and playing games in weekdays. Overall, girls spend more time for chatting than boys; conversely, boys spend more time on playing games than girls.
According to the drawing, there is a similar percentage (over 25 per cent) between boys, girls and the average who spend under an hour on chatting in social media. The figure of girls, who spend less than an hour on playing games, is nearly 40 per cent which is higher by approximately five per cent than the others.
Turning to the number of students who spend one to three hours on relaxing, there is almost 30 per cent that girls spend on online chatting; instead of slightly over 40 per cent boys spend on playing games. The average number of students who spend time for both activities accounted for around 5 per cent
- Do you agree that modern technology has given us more leisure time than before? 56
- some people believe that culture will be ruined if it used to earn tourism revenue, but others consider that tourism is the only way of protecting a culture. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 61
- Fashion trend are difficult to follow. Some people think that they primarily exist fust to sell clothes so we should not follow them. To what extent do you agree with this opinion? 67
- Millions of dollars are spent on space research every year. Some people argue the money should be spent on improving living standards on earth. Do you agree or disagree? 67
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children’s sports between 2008 and 2014. The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 133, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and the average who spend under an hour on chatting in social media. The figure ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.48453608247 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 5.05154639175 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.03092783505 231% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 2.0 32.9175257732 6% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 26.3917525773 83% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.85567010309 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 710.0 937.175257732 76% => OK
No of words: 151.0 206.0 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70198675497 4.54256449028 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.78020617076 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26461018237 2.54303337028 89% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 127.690721649 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529801324503 0.622605031667 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 202.5 290.88556701 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.41237113402 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.13402061856 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 1.44329896907 139% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 12.6804123711 47% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 16.3608247423 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.568049199 44.8134815571 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.333333333 76.5299724578 155% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1666666667 16.8248392259 150% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.33333333333 4.34317383033 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.29896907216 70% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 7.41237113402 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.94845360825 25% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193794668558 0.216113520407 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120026116919 0.0766984524023 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460156437241 0.0603063233224 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149003634581 0.12726935374 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0585768369807 0.0580467560999 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 8.37731958763 159% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 70.7449484536 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 7.45979381443 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 8.71597938144 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 7.59969072165 103% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 41.2886597938 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 8.62886597938 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 8.54432989691 140% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.