the charts below changes in the proportion of the energy produced from different resources in a country in 1985 and 2003
The two pie charts compare the percentages of energy generated from six different sources in a country in 1985 and 2004.
Overall after 17 years, oil was still the dominant source for energy production despite a significant decrease in its proportion. Conversely, this country became more dependent on natural gas,coal and renewable sources.
In 1985, over half of energy was produced from oil-the most popular source, and this figure exactly quadrupled that of natural gas with only 13%. Meanwhile, nuclear power was the second most used source, providing nearly a quarter of the total energy volume. However, after nearly two decades, while the use of two major sources in 1985 decreased markedly to 39% for oil and a modest 8% for nuclear power, that of natural gas saw a 10% increase.
Regarding other sources, the amount energy produced from coal accounted for a negligible percentage of 8% in 1995, and then experienced a nearly threefold rise to 22%, making coal the third largest source in 2003. Renewable sources and hydro power each contributed an insignificant 4% to the total power generation in 2003, after a fourfold rise and a stability in the uses of the former and the later respectively, compared to initial figure.
- the table below describes victims by age group and offence category in Venezuela 1999 70
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries. 73
- The given pie charts detail the proportion of Australian secondary school graduates who were unemployed employed or pursuing further education in 1980 1990 and 2000 64
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 73
- Schools are no longer necessary because children can get so much information available through the Internet and they can study just as well at home. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 43
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , coal
...try became more dependent on natural gas,coal and renewable sources. In 1985, over...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 445, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...spectively, compared to initial figure.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, however, if, regarding, second, so, still, then, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.48453608247 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 5.05154639175 158% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 32.9175257732 15% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 26.3917525773 121% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.85567010309 78% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1041.0 937.175257732 111% => OK
No of words: 204.0 206.0 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10294117647 4.54256449028 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.78020617076 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69600267273 2.54303337028 106% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 127.690721649 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593137254902 0.622605031667 95% => OK
syllable_count: 320.4 290.88556701 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 2.0 0.824742268041 243% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.83505154639 163% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.463917525773 431% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 1.44329896907 346% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6804123711 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 16.3608247423 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.3957738095 44.8134815571 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.125 76.5299724578 170% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 16.8248392259 152% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.75 4.34317383033 224% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 2.54639175258 79% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 7.41237113402 94% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.94845360825 25% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202290293573 0.216113520407 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0955125687895 0.0766984524023 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0903862555234 0.0603063233224 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144244166849 0.12726935374 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0943998827124 0.0580467560999 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 8.37731958763 183% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 70.7449484536 65% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 7.45979381443 174% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 8.71597938144 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 7.59969072165 120% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 41.2886597938 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 8.62886597938 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 8.54432989691 140% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 8.15463917526 159% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.