The diagrams below show the development of a small fishing village and its surrounding area into a large European tourist resort Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The diagrams below show the development of a small fishing village and its surrounding area into a large European tourist resort.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The maps show the developments that have taken place in small fishing village over some period of time. It is clear that the village underwent a dramatic transformation over the period, becoming large touristic city and there built lots of touristic places.
Looking at the diagrams in more detail, we can see that high hotels have been built to stay for visitors. The other physical structures that have been added are the road to other village, tourist shop and two beachs. Before these developments the village consist of some houses boats and a harbor for visitors.
As well as the buildings mentioned above, the new facilities on the island include a golf course where tourists can learn playing golf. The woodland was cutting to made golf area. And the olives field was altered to farmland which fruits and vegetables are cultured for hotels. But old habitants homes have not been changed.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-12-29 farhodyusupov 61 view
Essays by user farhodyusupov :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 89, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...lace in small fishing village over some period of time. It is clear that the village underwent...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 123, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to play'.
Suggestion: to play
... a golf course where tourists can learn playing golf. The woodland was cutting to made ...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, look, so, well, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.48453608247 107% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 4.92783505155 41% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 5.05154639175 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.03092783505 198% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 32.9175257732 21% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 26.3917525773 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.85567010309 26% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 747.0 937.175257732 80% => OK
No of words: 151.0 206.0 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94701986755 4.54256449028 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.78020617076 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4373560173 2.54303337028 96% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 127.690721649 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.682119205298 0.622605031667 110% => OK
syllable_count: 228.6 290.88556701 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 4.0 0.824742268041 485% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.463917525773 431% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 1.44329896907 69% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6804123711 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 16.3608247423 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9378516966 44.8134815571 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.0 76.5299724578 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7777777778 16.8248392259 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 4.34317383033 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.29896907216 70% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 2.54639175258 79% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 7.41237113402 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.94845360825 152% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145146792525 0.216113520407 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0541736272346 0.0766984524023 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050637406964 0.0603063233224 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0959317200095 0.12726935374 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0600777217374 0.0580467560999 103% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 8.37731958763 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 70.7449484536 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 7.45979381443 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 8.71597938144 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 7.59969072165 112% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 41.2886597938 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 8.62886597938 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 8.54432989691 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.