The diagrams below show the existing ground floor plan of a house and a proposed plan for some building work.
The given figure picturize the advent of ground floor plan of a house and a suggestion plan for some building work.
From an overall perspective, it is conspicuous that there are dramatical changes from the top to the bottom between the reality and the offering, beginning with the disappearance of the hall to make way for the ladder expansion.
According to the data given in these images, hall is located in the ground floor with two entrance doors to the South and to the West of the building. Moreover, to the North, there are two internal door which is supplanted by the stairs and existed in the entry of the kitchen to the right in the proposed design. Next, the internal wall is reduced from 2 to 1 and the left wall still remain unchanged. Although there are many change in the direction and location of door, wall, etc, the storage totally alter by stairs on the ground floor.
Moving to another detail, there is no border to the left of the living room. Furthermore, in the proposed changes, the is a new existence of the kitchen furnitue to the left of the kitchen which makes this place look more attractive. Finally, there are substantial change after the proposal and this building witness the mitigation of hall and storage to make way for stairs expansion and serve for the ground floor plan.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 199, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'doors'?
Suggestion: doors
...r, to the North, there are two internal door which is supplanted by the stairs and e...
^^^^
Line 5, column 199, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'door' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'doors'.
Suggestion: doors
...r, to the North, there are two internal door which is supplanted by the stairs and e...
^^^^
Line 5, column 423, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun change seems to be countable; consider using: 'many changes'.
Suggestion: many changes
...ll remain unchanged. Although there are many change in the direction and location of door, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, look, moreover, so, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.48453608247 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 5.05154639175 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 32.9175257732 15% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 26.3917525773 144% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.85567010309 182% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1088.0 937.175257732 116% => OK
No of words: 232.0 206.0 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68965517241 4.54256449028 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.78020617076 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49273617746 2.54303337028 98% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 127.690721649 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508620689655 0.622605031667 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 329.4 290.88556701 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 4.0 0.824742268041 485% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6804123711 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 16.3608247423 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.7933526814 44.8134815571 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.888888889 76.5299724578 158% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7777777778 16.8248392259 153% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 4.34317383033 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 2.54639175258 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 7.41237113402 40% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.94845360825 127% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308057175015 0.216113520407 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122851729244 0.0766984524023 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.162632649644 0.0603063233224 270% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215580470106 0.12726935374 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.191857180968 0.0580467560999 331% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 8.37731958763 161% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 70.7449484536 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 7.45979381443 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 8.71597938144 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 7.59969072165 106% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 41.2886597938 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 8.62886597938 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 8.54432989691 140% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.