Recently, the idea of the global language is getting more and more popular. The population of languages in the world has been losing one by one annually, it is argued that it would be the most convenient if there were fewer languages. This essay will discuss what happens when a language is left behind the past, and an agreement with the opposition.
First of all, every language in its own country has a close connection to the tradition and the whole culture of that country. The formation of the country is based on its mother tongue which is a basis of a community. For millenniums, a national costume, characteristic and history have altered numerous time every time when there was a development in language, which means language illustrates the citizens. Moreover, speech is in people's blood, for instance, in Japan, when speaking, Japanese usually rise their voice, which shows that they are brave and dedicated.
Another reason for the disagreement of eliminating languages is diversity. There are words which only appear in its own language represent how important is the diversity of languages. As an illustration, it was not until when Britain borrowed the word ''mosquito'' from France, the citizens had known what to describe that creature. Grammar also plays a vital role. Linguistics have applied several kinds of grammar to perfect the languages. For example, in the US, there is no gender discrimination but in France, there is.
In conclusion, the intention of excluding languages is against the will of most of the people and causes lack of diversity and even possibly destroy a whole culture
- Research shows that business meetings, discussions and training are happening online nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 56
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourists facilities.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billion) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002. 84
- the table below gives information about consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1355.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07490636704 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81910289002 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584269662921 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2161156637 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.7857142857 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0714285714 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193822725925 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0558559395054 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423436854356 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105998144033 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346230885594 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.