The line graph compares the average output of CO2 per person in four different countries namely the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal from 1967 to 2007. The unit is measured in metric tones. Overall, it is immediately apparent that over the years , the United Kingdom and sweden had a significant drop in the emission of carbon dioxide while Italy and Portugal had increased emissions.
Moving to a more detailed analysis, in 1967, the emissions of CO2 was 11 metric tones which steadily decreased to 8.5 metric tones in 2007 but still remained higher than the other countries. Sweden stood second and had 8.5 metric tonnes emissions in 1967 which inclined dramatically reaching a peak of 10.2 metric tonnes in 1977. After that there was a sharp fall and continued to be so reaching 5.5 metric tonnes which coincided with Portugal on the same year.
In contrast to the previous two countries, Italy and Portugal had 4.1 and 1.5 metric tonnes emissions of CO2 which subsequently rose to 7.5 and 5.5 metric tonnes respectively with small fluctuations. Italy, however, overtook Sweden in the year 1987.
- Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair.Discuss both of these views and give your own opinion. 93
- Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of having a car. 61
- The charts below give information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970 and 2000 an the marital status of adult Americans in two of the years. 67
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. others, however, think that change is always a good thing. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 256, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...immediately apparent that over the years , the United Kingdom and sweden had a sig...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, so, still, while, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.48453608247 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 5.05154639175 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.03092783505 198% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 32.9175257732 9% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 26.3917525773 99% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.85567010309 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 929.0 937.175257732 99% => OK
No of words: 185.0 206.0 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02162162162 4.54256449028 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.78020617076 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5825765622 2.54303337028 102% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 127.690721649 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594594594595 0.622605031667 96% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 290.88556701 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 4.0 0.824742268041 485% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6804123711 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 16.3608247423 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.4326036364 44.8134815571 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.125 76.5299724578 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 16.8248392259 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.875 4.34317383033 204% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.29896907216 70% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 7.41237113402 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218955948965 0.216113520407 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102636782476 0.0766984524023 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0869541262129 0.0603063233224 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16437886533 0.12726935374 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105410647202 0.0580467560999 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 8.37731958763 165% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 70.7449484536 80% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 7.45979381443 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 8.71597938144 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 7.59969072165 120% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 41.2886597938 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 8.62886597938 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 8.54432989691 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 8.15463917526 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.