the graphs shows internet usage in taiwan by age group year 1998/2000
The bar graph depicts the amount of internet used by a variety of age groups in Taiwan from 1998 to 2000. The age groups included are 15 or less, 16 - 30, 31 - 50 and 50 or above.
Overall, what stands out is that the highest percentage of usage is reported by 16 to 30-year-olds, whereas the least is by the young with the age of 15 or less.
With regard to statistics, the most substantial use of internet facilities is contributed by people of age from 16 to 50. Figures for the year 1998 for groups 16 to 30 and 31 to 50 age are 53% and 41% respectively. In addition, although their usage was high it dropped by nearly 10 percent to reach 44 % for adults, and for the age group 31 to 50 it slipped to 37 percent in 2000.
In contrast, the numbers for the age group of less than 15 and the elderly are the lowest constituting of 2 and 4 percent in 1998. However, in 1999 the figures for the former quadrupled to reach 8%, the latter doubled to the same, which remained nearly unchanged for the following year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-12 | Anne020304 | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-25 | nhathongk2003 | 78 | view |
| 2022-01-14 | thuyan | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-18 | satwinderkaur | 73 | view |
| 2020-10-14 | kushang | 73 | view |
- The number of residents and nonresident visitors to the city centre 78
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this period most of the complaints re
- Some people believe that increasing violence in the media is the cause of increasing violence in our society especially among children Others believe that children s peer groups and parental role models are a much more powerful influence on children s beh 50
- The number of cases of whooping cough before and after vaccination 89
- The chart below shows what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, whereas, in addition, in contrast, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.48453608247 107% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 5.05154639175 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 32.9175257732 12% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 26.3917525773 136% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.85567010309 26% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 825.0 937.175257732 88% => OK
No of words: 194.0 206.0 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.25257731959 4.54256449028 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.78020617076 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5167735884 2.54303337028 99% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 127.690721649 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530927835052 0.622605031667 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 229.5 290.88556701 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.41237113402 85% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.13402061856 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 0.824742268041 606% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6804123711 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 16.3608247423 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 31.6810274455 44.8134815571 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.125 76.5299724578 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 16.8248392259 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 4.34317383033 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 7.41237113402 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341311716254 0.216113520407 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16109980028 0.0766984524023 210% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116692797527 0.0603063233224 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210882203498 0.12726935374 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0999523060666 0.0580467560999 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 8.37731958763 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 80.96 70.7449484536 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 7.45979381443 106% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.67 8.71597938144 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 7.59969072165 104% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 41.2886597938 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 8.62886597938 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 8.54432989691 136% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 8.15463917526 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.