An increase in production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment. What are the causes and possible solutions?
Nowadays the civil commodities are being manufactured in a breakneck speed and as a result, there is plenty of impairment to the natural habitat. This phenomenon resulted from several reasons and measures should be taken to tackle it.
On the one hand, there is a variety of explanations for this issue. First of all, the increase in the stock of consumer merchandises is accompanied by the establishment of manufactories. There seem to be shreds of evidence that in numerous nations, especially the industrialized ones, trees are being cut down for the purpose of making room for factory construction and this is reportedly attributed to the deforestation. Another illustration of this is that emissions discharging from these industrial units are contaminating the atmosphere, the soil and even the water resources located nearby. In the second place, it is also raising the amount of rubbishes disposing into the environment. It is irrefutable that the major of consumer goods is the disposable ones which can only be used in a short-term. Hence, the land will soon be overloaded with the hazardous waste that is responsible for the degradation of residence of both humanity and wild creatures.
Consequently, solutions should be taken into consideration to eliminating this tendency. First and foremost is to raise awareness among the population through education and mass media. This will indirectly diminish the waste volume released into the environment and therefore, decreasing the adverse effect on the dwelling area. Another resolution that worth considering is that the government should use taxations to encourage people to protect the environment. The value-added tax, which imposed on the supply chains form production to the point of sale, can be an appropriate case in point. Furthermore, taxes can also be used as incentive tools to promote the eco-friendly properties
To summarize, the increase in the production of civil goods resulted in the emerging of manufactories as well as waste disposal and there are some solutions to combat this problem including raising public awareness or using taxes as a means of protecting the environment
- Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants Why do you think people waste food What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away 67
- Children spend too much time watching TV nowadays What are problems and solutions 91
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 57
- In many countries young people leave rural areas to study or work in cities What do you think are the reasons for this Do you think the advantages outweight the disadvantages 78
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 793, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...sposable ones which can only be used in a short-term. Hence, the land will soon be overloade...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, second, so, therefore, well, as a result, as well as, first of all, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 7.48453608247 321% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 4.92783505155 162% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 5.05154639175 198% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.03092783505 264% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 17.0 32.9175257732 52% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 26.3917525773 189% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 3.85567010309 493% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1822.0 937.175257732 194% => OK
No of words: 340.0 206.0 165% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35882352941 4.54256449028 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 3.78020617076 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19485962566 2.54303337028 126% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 127.690721649 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555882352941 0.622605031667 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 585.9 290.88556701 201% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.41237113402 120% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.13402061856 44% => OK
Article: 5.0 0.824742268041 606% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6804123711 118% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 16.3608247423 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.5906884075 44.8134815571 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.466666667 76.5299724578 159% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 16.8248392259 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.26666666667 4.34317383033 213% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 7.41237113402 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.49484536082 268% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.94845360825 127% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14193071285 0.216113520407 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0417344862687 0.0766984524023 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473495856065 0.0603063233224 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101491802708 0.12726935374 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0606224982883 0.0580467560999 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 8.37731958763 181% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 70.7449484536 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 3.82989690722 292% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 7.45979381443 176% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 8.71597938144 162% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 7.59969072165 126% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 41.2886597938 254% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 8.62886597938 139% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 8.54432989691 126% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.