the diagrams below give information about two main road tunnels in one Australian city
The map demonstrates a project to build the two road tunnels in one Australian city in two periods time between 1987 to 1992 and 2004 to 2007.
Overall, it is clear that the principal change to the city removed a bridge at the center. Various other developments concerning a road and a cross-section were extending in this tunnel B.
Looking at the map in more detail, we can see that the largest bridge demolished. After that, there was a variety of buildings constructed over the tunnel B from 2004 to 2007. The other physical improvements of tunnel B were expanded to a deep and a length, with 35 meters and 3.6 kilometers respectively.
The next innovate that a new road built under the ground through the two sides of the sea. Additionally, the cross-section of the tunnel B extended with three tubes. Finally, the cost of renovation of the tunnel B was higher than that of tunnel A, from 556 million dollars to 1.1 million dollars.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-07 | letrang250191 | 11 | view |
| 2023-02-24 | letrang250191 | 84 | view |
| 2022-10-23 | myduyen282 | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-02 | lucluc | view | |
| 2022-03-17 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 11 | view |
- the diagrams below give information about two main road tunnels in one Australian city 67
- The chart below shows information about students studying in six main subjects at a US university in 2010 78
- The pie charts below show the percentage of housing owned and rented in the UK in 1991 and 2007 Summarize the information by describing the main features of the charts and making comparisons where appropriate 20
- The table below shows thenumbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and after it was refurbished The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit during the same two periods 89
- The pie charts below show the percentage of housing owned and rented in the UK in 1991 and 2007 Summarize the information by describing the main features of the charts and making comparisons where appropriate
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 188, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...section were extending in this tunnel B. Looking at the map in more detail, we ca...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, look
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 775.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6686746988 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83543024651 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584337349398 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 223.2 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.9126090684 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.1111111111 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4444444444 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.44444444444 5.23603664747 28% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229237001857 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0844629934572 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0808004395803 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147246033923 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.092341156201 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.