Recently, the trend of doing part-time jobs has increased among students and many parents have welcomed this development. While studying and working simultaneously is advantageous financially and helps with personality development, it is often stressful and negatively impacts the performance of students.
The benefit of working along with studies is that it eases burden of parents and creates a sense of financial responsibility among younger generation. The quality education has become expensive in most countries and parents often find it difficult to afford sending their children to good schools and colleges. Especially in countries where public education has poor standards, parents are forced to pay hefty fees in private institutes to ensure bright future for their kids. In such scenario, if students contribute towards their education by earning their tuition fee by working in spare time, it can alleviate financial burden of their parents massively. For instance, In US, parents can save for their retirement because it is mandatory for every college kid to work and contribute in his fee. Moreover, it teaches youngsters value of money and gives them a sense of financial security.
However, working along with studies often results in low grades and anxiety issues among pupils. The academics have become extremely competitive and students have to work twice as hard to cope up with this fast paced world. In this situation, managing a job along with school or college becomes burdensome and pupils often perform abysmally in school. Some even fail frequently and decide to quit their degree, leading to an increase in under-qualified population. In UK, for instance, many people drop out of high school because they cannot manage studies while making a living. Furthermore, statistics indicate that working long hours in attempt to manage job and study results in medical issues like depression and anxiety among students.
To conclude, many parents have begun encouraging their children to work while completing their education. Although this helps in future generation becoming financially responsible and parents being able to manage money conveniently, it also significantly reduce their chances of excelling in academics and even results in poor mental well-being. Therefore, this clearly proves that if parents can afford education of their offspring, they should stop them from doing job in their free time to ensure they complete their degrees timely.
- The diagram below shows how the water cycle works. 56
- Many children are encouraged by their parents to get a part time job in their free time. What are the advantages and disadvantages to children of doing so. 78
- Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead.To what extent do yo u agree with this statement? 67
- Completing university education is thought by some to be the best way to get a good job. On the other hand other people think that getting experience and developing soft skills is more important.Discuss both side and give your opinion? 73
- The diagram below shows how the water cycle works. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 259, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to send'.
Suggestion: to send
...rents often find it difficult to afford sending their children to good schools and coll...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.48453608247 94% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 4.92783505155 101% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 5.05154639175 356% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.03092783505 132% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 32.9175257732 106% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 26.3917525773 220% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 16.0 3.85567010309 415% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2101.0 937.175257732 224% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 383.0 206.0 186% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48563968668 4.54256449028 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 3.78020617076 117% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82347218394 2.54303337028 111% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 127.690721649 164% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545691906005 0.622605031667 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 656.1 290.88556701 226% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.41237113402 120% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.13402061856 66% => OK
Article: 4.0 0.824742268041 485% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.83505154639 163% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 1.44329896907 346% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6804123711 134% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 16.3608247423 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.996812833 44.8134815571 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.588235294 76.5299724578 161% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5294117647 16.8248392259 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11764705882 4.34317383033 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 7.41237113402 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.49484536082 468% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.94845360825 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288594775977 0.216113520407 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0932797099859 0.0766984524023 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100983739621 0.0603063233224 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189462537562 0.12726935374 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105914196715 0.0580467560999 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 8.37731958763 187% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 70.7449484536 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 7.45979381443 176% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 8.71597938144 170% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 7.59969072165 122% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 41.2886597938 266% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 8.62886597938 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 8.54432989691 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 8.15463917526 159% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.