Recruiting employees is considered to be the most crucial task in the employment sectors. Although a growing number of people prefer taking interviews for the selection of employees, there are other various methods such as written examinations, group discussions, and presentations. I believe giving presentations is the most appropriate way as it not only assess the knowledge of the person but also his suitability for the job.
To begin with, there are a plethora of ways appointing the employees. Firstly, freshers can be employed by written examinations. If there are pen and paper-based exams, which includes short answer, matching, and multiple-choice questions, there would be a better judgment of students in terms of their knowledge and time management. Secondly, group discussions are another way to consider for the selection process. It would be simple to judge a person that how critical he or she can think as well as the thought process of the individuals. Last but not least, to give a presentation is one of these ways recruiting the job seekers with the help of which knowledge of the person can be assessed.
In my opinion, presentations, giving on the digitals, are the most suitable method for recruiting the employees since employers can judge the confidence of the individuals in addition to his or her immense knowledge. Moreover, feedback can also be provided by the other staff members provided that they should be present at the time of presentation. In a number of instances, it can be seen that in developed countries, 70% of managers recruit youngsters based on their performance in presentations.
In conclusion, while interviews are considered to be the most popular method for job employment, other methods: presentations, group discussions, and written examinations have their importance. To my mind, owners had better choose the presentation method.
- A lot of social problems can be related to teenagers these days. Some feel that this is because parents are not able to spend enough time to take care of their teenage child. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- The number of older people is increasing. Some people think it will cause the problem to their countries, others believe this group is important to society. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 84
- Most people take interviews to elect a person for job. What are the other ways? What do you think is the best way to recruiters new employees? 78
- These days people in some countries are living in a “throw-away” society, which means people use things in a short time and then throw them away. Causes and problems. 89
- The difference in age between parents and their children has increased compared to the past. Do you think the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'pens'?
Suggestion: pens
...d by written examinations. If there are pen and paper-based exams, which includes s...
^^^
Line 7, column 257, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... better choose the presentation method.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 7.48453608247 240% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 4.92783505155 183% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 5.05154639175 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.03092783505 165% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 32.9175257732 58% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 26.3917525773 140% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.85567010309 337% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 937.175257732 170% => OK
No of words: 300.0 206.0 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31666666667 4.54256449028 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.78020617076 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24655543957 2.54303337028 128% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 127.690721649 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543333333333 0.622605031667 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 477.0 290.88556701 164% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.13402061856 33% => OK
Article: 0.0 0.824742268041 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.83505154639 163% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.463917525773 647% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 1.44329896907 416% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6804123711 110% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 16.3608247423 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.9416795027 44.8134815571 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.928571429 76.5299724578 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 16.8248392259 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9285714286 4.34317383033 252% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 2.54639175258 79% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 7.41237113402 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.94845360825 127% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218667645316 0.216113520407 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0799702296419 0.0766984524023 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597096366532 0.0603063233224 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147934181304 0.12726935374 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0764426510154 0.0580467560999 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 8.37731958763 171% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 70.7449484536 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 7.45979381443 154% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 8.71597938144 156% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 7.59969072165 118% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 41.2886597938 199% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 8.62886597938 99% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 8.54432989691 122% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.