It is frequently argued that pupils study far more with their teachers than other sources such as the internet or television. To some extent, I suppose that children can learn a lot from the internet and television, but I am also in favor of educators being still relevant in the modern age. In this essay, I will demonstrate my point of view.
To begin with, it is plain that studying with schoolteachers yields various assets. Lecturers are predecessors who have an in-depth intelligence; for this reason, they know how to comprehend properly and have a logical study regimen. For example, numerous idle graduates excitedly declare that they were thankful for their assistance since they constantly reminded them to complete their homework and meticulously encouraged them, which made them more driven. Not only do they have academic insight, but they also understand distinctive students' needs and gifts in order to provide the most effective methods of educating them. Apprentices, who solely educate themselves through online training, may have difficulty processing what they heard and saw since there is too much material to categorize and pick. Without teachers, they will be unable to determine when and how to begin. Furthermore, instructors may assist undergraduates in cultivating momentous soft skills in addition to studying. Juniors may interact with their tutors and classmates while attending face-to-face sessions, which gives them the opportunity to enhance their interpersonal communication skills. To illustrate, if they have any queries or answers, they would boldly ask instructors and argue with peers to convey their views. Similarly, assistants teach learners how to be decent citizens. Apprentices are taught moral precepts in order that they can treat people well. Mentors also teach students about living an optimistic life and overcoming hardship. Accordingly, scholars may step-by-step evolve to join life, which “virtual professors” such as the internet can educate them.
On the other hand, it is not frequently radical to have supervisors' guides; juniors can study themselves using alternative resources such as the internet or privileged webs. Students will be able to broaden their horizons through various media, more specifically, if young students learn about an earthquake, they can obtain vivid instruction, including 3-dimensional images and videos by searching it online. Consequently, individuals can learn more efficiently compared to the traditional way which is learning from the textbook with teachers. Furthermore, especially, from the perspective of the University students who be required to search wider and deeper intelligence, the internet and television will be a decisive learning technique for them in lieu of the only professor’s presentation. They can simply access up-to-date material, particularly thesis and articles pertaining to the topic that they are engrossed, and also gain valuable information rapidly and effortlessly.
To summarize, that technology may be educational, is not in dispute; yet, the job of supervisors is not substituted. Only until it is passed down by tutors does the ocean of philosophy become truly accessible to scholars.
- Students learn far more with their teachers than other sources Internet or television To what extent do you agree or disagree 92
- Some people believe that studying online is more effective than studying on campus while others disagree Discuss both the views and provide your opinion 61
- Some people believe that studying online is more effective than studying on campus while others disagree Discuss both the views and provide your opinion 80
- As major cities in the world are growing today so do their problems What are problems for young people who are living in the cities as the result of continued growth How problems might be solved 84
- Students learn far more with their teachers than other sources Internet or television To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 644, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rsity students who be required to search wider and deeper intelligence, the inter...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, consequently, furthermore, if, may, similarly, so, still, well, while, for example, i suppose, in addition, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 47.0 24.0651302605 195% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2736.0 1615.20841683 169% => OK
No of words: 488.0 315.596192385 155% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60655737705 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70007681154 4.20363070211 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10155475485 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 288.0 176.041082164 164% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590163934426 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 837.9 506.74238477 165% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4170341951 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.956521739 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2173913043 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.52173913043 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215002939153 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0566718073715 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0807268861288 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136165414822 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101566819678 0.056905535591 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.21 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 171.0 78.4519038076 218% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.