The table below shows the consumer durables (telephone, refrigerator, etc.) owned in
Britain from 1972 to 1983.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.
The table provides information regarding the percentage of households owing consumer durables (television, vacuum cleaner, etc.) in Britain from 1972 to 1983.
Overall, we can observe a growing adoption of consumer durables among the populace. The dishwasher was the least used at circa 5, whose utilization started in the year 1978, and television was the most used product among others in the given period. Video usage is seen only in the year 1983 when 18 percent of citizens used it in their routine.
Though increasing over the years, some durables saw a growth of over 25 percent, whereas some others witnessed a growth of hardly around 10 percent. Central heating and telephone adoption raised sharply with a percentage difference of over 25 from around 30-39 and 42, in the year 1972 to 64 and 77 in the year 1983, respectively.
Television and vacuum cleaners saw a growth of less than 10 percent changing from 93 and 87 in the initial years to 98 and 95 in the final years, respectively. Refrigerators and washing machines had a surge of over 10 percent from 73 and 66 to 94 and 80, respectively, in the given 11-year period.
- A bar graph showing research students across five subjects in 2005
- The Chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruits and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi 73
- The chart below shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 73
- Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge of the following topic Prevention is better than cure Out of a country s health budget a large proportion should be diverted from treatment to spending on health educati 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.48453608247 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 5.05154639175 198% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 32.9175257732 9% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 26.3917525773 140% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.85567010309 130% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 944.0 937.175257732 101% => OK
No of words: 195.0 206.0 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84102564103 4.54256449028 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.78020617076 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76349834031 2.54303337028 109% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 127.690721649 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574358974359 0.622605031667 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 274.5 290.88556701 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 2.0 0.824742268041 243% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6804123711 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 16.3608247423 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.1737386837 44.8134815571 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.888888889 76.5299724578 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 16.8248392259 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88888888889 4.34317383033 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 7.41237113402 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145354953239 0.216113520407 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0839762066673 0.0766984524023 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0908003039457 0.0603063233224 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113181505044 0.12726935374 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103076422352 0.0580467560999 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 8.37731958763 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 70.7449484536 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 7.45979381443 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 8.71597938144 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 7.59969072165 113% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 41.2886597938 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 8.62886597938 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 8.54432989691 122% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.