The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010.
The charts compare the number of online sales for four different sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010.
Overall, it is evident that there were changes in all categories. While the online shopping sales for food and beverage and video games increased, these figures for home funishing and electronics and appliances declined.
In 2005, food and beverage accounted for 22% of total online sales. This figure rose up to 32% in 2010 and became the sectors which had the highest figure of sales. Having similar trend, the percentage of video games solds in 2005 was 18% and then this increased by 5%, to 23% in 2010.
In contrast, the online sales for electronics and appliances and home funishing decreased in the observed years. Electronics and appliances was the sector having the highest figure for sales in 2005, at 35%. This figure fell to only 30% in 2010, enjoying the second place. Home funishing accounted for 25% of total online shoppling sales in 2005 and then declined to only 15% in 2010, became the lowest figure for sales.
- The Bar graph bellow shows the Expenditure in pence per week on fast food items by income groups in the UK Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below 89
- The table illustrates the proportion of monthy household income five European countries spend on food and drink, housing, clothing and entertainment. 78
- The table below gives information about the average annual spending of university students in three different countries 67
- It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history. To what extent, do you argee or disargee? 56
- Some people believe that crime is a result of social problems and poverty others think that crime is a result of bad person s nature Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 858.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84745762712 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38266747163 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491525423729 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.4875384379 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.8 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33879330793 0.215688989381 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151756308764 0.103423049105 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118459699477 0.0843802449381 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253785732421 0.15604864568 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119463518822 0.0819641961636 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.