The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade - labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, make comparisons where relevant.
The tables compare information about the sales of coffee and bananas labelled as fairtrade in five different european nations in millions of euros in 1999 and 2004.
In an overview, it can be noticed that, uk was the leading market for fairtrade labelled coffee in both years as compared to other nations whereas, swiss people preffered banana of this category more in later year as oppose to other people of different countries
As can be depicted from the table that, the market for fairtrade labelled coffee, increased dramatucally from 1.5 to 20 millions of euros in the year 2004, and increase of about 19 millions in 5 years. Similar trenf of increment can be seen for Switzerland and belgium, however in lesser quantities. As for denmark the trend remained almost constant in both years.
On the other hand, the market for fair trade labelled bananas, the preference of banana of swiss people doubled for about 47 millions of euros in 5 years of time. The market rate in uk and belgium also slumped for 5.5 and 4 millions of euros respectively whereas the sales in denmark and sweden
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 155, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ean nations in millions of euros in 1999 and 2004. In an overview, it can be ...
^^
Line 3, column 215, Rule ID: AS_OPPOSE_TO_AS_OPPOSED_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'as opposed to'?
Suggestion: as opposed to
...ana of this category more in later year as oppose to other people of different countries ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 263, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e to other people of different countries As can be depicted from the table that, ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 118, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '20 million'.
Suggestion: 20 million
...fee, increased dramatucally from 1.5 to 20 millions of euros in the year 2004, and increase of...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 301, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... belgium, however in lesser quantities. As for denmark the trend remained almost c...
^^
Line 7, column 123, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '47 million'.
Suggestion: 47 million
...anana of swiss people doubled for about 47 millions of euros in 5 years of time. The market ra...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 223, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '4 million'.
Suggestion: 4 million
...uk and belgium also slumped for 5.5 and 4 millions of euros respectively whereas the sales in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, whereas, as for, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.48453608247 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 4.92783505155 61% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 5.05154639175 139% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 32.9175257732 12% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 26.3917525773 129% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.85567010309 78% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 914.0 937.175257732 98% => OK
No of words: 188.0 206.0 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86170212766 4.54256449028 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.78020617076 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5448000399 2.54303337028 100% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 127.690721649 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510638297872 0.622605031667 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 273.6 290.88556701 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 5.0 0.824742268041 606% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 1.44329896907 139% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 12.6804123711 47% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 16.3608247423 189% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 133.060658682 44.8134815571 297% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 152.333333333 76.5299724578 199% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.3333333333 16.8248392259 186% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 4.34317383033 219% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 2.54639175258 275% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 7.41237113402 40% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177105888703 0.216113520407 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107308022101 0.0766984524023 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.156223069868 0.0603063233224 259% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159912342363 0.12726935374 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.165624368215 0.0580467560999 285% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 8.37731958763 204% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 70.7449484536 69% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 7.45979381443 190% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.5 8.71597938144 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 7.59969072165 113% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 41.2886597938 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 27.0 8.62886597938 313% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 14.4 8.54432989691 169% => OK
text_standard: 27.0 8.15463917526 331% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.