The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The figure depicts information about the fish and various types of meat eaten by the people in european nation in grams per person from 1979 to 2004.
In an overview, it can be noticed that people of european nation preferred chicken more in later years whereas , the consumption of beef, lamb and fish went in opposite trend.
As can be depicted from the figure that the consumption of chicken increased rapidly from just under 150 grams per week to around 250 grams between 1979 and 2004, a rise of about 100 grams in 25 years.
On the other hand, beef which was the most eaten meat in the initial year declined significantly from 220 grams to 110 grams in the final year, although it reached at its peak level of 240 grams in 1983. Similar trend of decrement can be seen for lamb however, in lesser quantities. As for fish which was eaten the least by the people of a european nation remained constant at almost 50 grams throughout the given period of time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | Lovepreet123 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | KIM JINUK | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | KIM JINUK | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | anasrafiq | 73 | view |
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The graph below shows the differences in wheat exports over three different areas.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.» Write at least 150 words. 61
- Many people believe that its better to learn something in a group rather than individually To what extent do you agree or disagree 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 111, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...rred chicken more in later years whereas , the consumption of beef, lamb and fish ...
^^
Line 7, column 284, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...for lamb however, in lesser quantities. As for fish which was eaten the least by t...
^^
Line 7, column 415, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...at almost 50 grams throughout the given period of time.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, whereas, as for, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 795.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56896551724 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30729809296 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580459770115 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 221.4 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.39758903 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.5 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.23603664747 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113230065462 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0640736404495 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054820141601 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0882136858412 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0500734173008 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.42 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.82 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.