The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
The diagrams illustrate changes in the path traffic to the city hospital in the years 2007 and 2010.
It is clear that the principal change to the city hospital was roundabouts instead of crossroads in 2010. Various other developments with regard to the bus station and public car park have accompanied the building of these roundabouts.
Looking at the map of the city hospital in 2007, we can see that a main road to the infirmary run through hospital road from south to north. The bus stops had situated along either side of the hospital road. Moreover, the parking place was overall and for the staff either for the visitors of the hospital.
The map view a bit changed in the years 2010, the bus station was built along the west side of the hospital street instead of the bus stops. Furthermore, the parking place has separated into two spaces: the staff car park close to the hospital road, it seems that increased in the area, and the public car park. Comparing both diagrams, the city hospital has remained surrounded by the ring road.
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- IELTS 10 Test 3 Writing Task 1 - Academic 11
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 67
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, look, moreover, so, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.48453608247 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 5.05154639175 79% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 32.9175257732 21% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 26.3917525773 102% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.85567010309 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 873.0 937.175257732 93% => OK
No of words: 184.0 206.0 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74456521739 4.54256449028 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.78020617076 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43103724935 2.54303337028 96% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 127.690721649 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532608695652 0.622605031667 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 247.5 290.88556701 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.41237113402 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.13402061856 33% => OK
Article: 7.0 0.824742268041 849% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 1.44329896907 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6804123711 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 16.3608247423 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 30.6340406157 44.8134815571 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0 76.5299724578 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 16.8248392259 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 4.34317383033 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 7.41237113402 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.49484536082 134% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.94845360825 127% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218172231524 0.216113520407 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0988162896926 0.0766984524023 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717788511343 0.0603063233224 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143444213673 0.12726935374 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428113809193 0.0580467560999 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 8.37731958763 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 70.7449484536 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 7.45979381443 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 8.71597938144 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 7.59969072165 95% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 41.2886597938 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 8.62886597938 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 8.54432989691 117% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 8.15463917526 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.