Water Usage Australia
The pie chart elucidates how was water consumption, whilst the bar chart illustrates its residential utilization in Australia in the year of 2004.
Overall, the most quantity of water was consumed by residential houses, and they utilized it, especially in the bathroom compared to the other places in this period.
To begin with, residential houses used more than half of the amount of liquid, which was 57 percent, however, dormitory apartments, industry, as well as businesses were consumed 13, 11, and 10 percent quantity respectively in 2004. In particular, the least amount of liquid was used by the government and others with 6 and 3 percent consecutively in that period.
Moreover, the Australian population was utilized almost 30 percent of water, especially, in the bathroom, where the highest percentage of liquid was wasted. Subsequently, the garden was in the second most prominent destination, where more than 25 percent of water consumed in the laundry room and 15 percent in the toilet. The significant point is the Australian residents used the least amount of water in the kitchen by sharply 10 percent.
- In many workplaces online communication is getting more common than meeting face to face Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 76
- The flow chart illustrates the consequence of deforestation Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features 78
- The graph below presents the employment patterns in the USA between 1930 and 2010 78
- The most effective way to solve traffic and transport problems in the cities is to encourage people from the suburbs or the countryside to live in the cities To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Nowadays most green energy is becoming evermore prevalent in both developed and developing countries Some argue they greatly reduce costs and are better for the environment others believe they are a serious threat to energy security Discuss both views and 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, second, well, in particular, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.48453608247 120% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 5.05154639175 99% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.03092783505 132% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 32.9175257732 15% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 26.3917525773 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.85567010309 130% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 943.0 937.175257732 101% => OK
No of words: 181.0 206.0 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20994475138 4.54256449028 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.78020617076 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98832215293 2.54303337028 118% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 127.690721649 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558011049724 0.622605031667 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 283.5 290.88556701 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.13402061856 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 0.824742268041 728% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.463917525773 431% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 12.6804123711 55% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 16.3608247423 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 33.7118643198 44.8134815571 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.714285714 76.5299724578 176% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8571428571 16.8248392259 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 4.34317383033 253% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 7.41237113402 40% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12769264807 0.216113520407 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0691164940263 0.0766984524023 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535597924107 0.0603063233224 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.089500427191 0.12726935374 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061116646648 0.0580467560999 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 8.37731958763 191% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 70.7449484536 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 3.82989690722 292% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 7.45979381443 174% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 8.71597938144 152% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 7.59969072165 117% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 41.2886597938 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 8.62886597938 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 8.54432989691 140% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 8.15463917526 196% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.