Dear David Jonhson,
How’re things with you? Hope that you’re doing well. It’s been a long time since we kept in touch. I had been struggling with my ex houses conditions. For example, it was a little bit old-fashioned and did not have isolation, as well as the heating system was not working as properly as it was supposed to. So I decided to move on immediately.
The new house has an impressive look from outside and I moved to the second floor of it. The most fascinating about the house its vast hall that I can invite my friends to watch a film together. Central-heated system which means I will pay less than I used to in my previous house is the second thing that appealed to me. There are two balconies overseeing the sea which I can enjoy with the cup of tea and enjoying the landscape. In addition to that, I can do barbeque as long as we can handle to dispose of the smoke that will appear.
Your visit will obviously make me happy if you can. We can enjoy the house together and do not worry about housework, I will do them all. I will be looking forward to hearing from you soon.
Best Regards
Erman DURAN
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 189, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...ouses conditions. For example, it was a little bit old-fashioned and did not have isolatio...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, second, so, well, for example, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.48453608247 107% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 4.92783505155 223% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 5.05154639175 79% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.03092783505 231% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 33.0 32.9175257732 100% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 26.3917525773 99% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.85567010309 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 939.0 937.175257732 100% => OK
No of words: 212.0 206.0 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.42924528302 4.54256449028 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.78020617076 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54878966662 2.54303337028 100% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 127.690721649 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641509433962 0.622605031667 103% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 290.88556701 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.41237113402 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.13402061856 77% => OK
Article: 2.0 0.824742268041 243% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 1.44329896907 69% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6804123711 118% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 16.3608247423 86% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3017723737 44.8134815571 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 62.6 76.5299724578 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.1333333333 16.8248392259 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.26666666667 4.34317383033 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.29896907216 70% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 7.41237113402 121% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.49484536082 134% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10321789549 0.216113520407 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0365261444399 0.0766984524023 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0386858674002 0.0603063233224 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0695175524348 0.12726935374 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0122241189812 0.0580467560999 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.5 8.37731958763 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.65 70.7449484536 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 7.45979381443 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.82 8.71597938144 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.16 7.59969072165 94% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 41.2886597938 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 8.62886597938 64% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 8.54432989691 89% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 8.15463917526 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.