A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Millions of animals have been used for experiments which develop science and technology. Those who are argue that, it is not right for animals and unacceptable, while others say that animal testing is very necessary for researches. In this essay, I shall discuss both of these views and give my opinion.
On one hand, people who support with animal testing think that it is very crucial to use animals in researches which can develop medical treatments and save many human lives. Vivisection can improve and adjust medicines to be more effective and less allergic before apply use with human. Without small creature lives trial in experiments, the effectiveness of drugs cannot be invented and a number of patients will suffer from diseases. The sacrifices of small creatures cannot be justified by human lives. Therefore, using animals test is unavoidable to improve human lives.
On the other hand, some defenders argue that it is very cruel and not right to use animals in experiments. Animals are also a living creature as well as human. It is unfair and unacceptable to hurt them for human benefits. They have to suffer and die from diseases and illness during laboratory which can be measured the effectiveness of medicines. For example, many mice have been used for test by scientists who do not care about how mice will suffer from pain. Therefore, it is very unfair for animal lives to be ended just to improve human researches.
From my perspective, I agree with animal testing is necessary in researches. Even though, it is very cruel for other living creatures, it can help many human lives which are mare valuable lives than a handful for animals in experiments.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-30 | Humayan Kabir | 67 | view |
2020-01-30 | Humayan Kabir | 56 | view |
2020-01-30 | Humayan Kabir | 56 | view |
2020-01-30 | Humayan Kabir | 56 | view |
2020-01-30 | Humayan Kabir | 73 | view |
- Q: Is freedom speech necessary in a free society? 65
- Many students decide to further their study abroad What are the benefits and drawbacks of studying abroad To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 65
- Several languages die every year Many people feel this is a positive trend and that a world with fewer languages promotes harmony and understanding between people Analyze both sides of this argument and provide your opinion 80
- Travelling in group with a tour guide is the best way to travel Do you agree or disagree with this statement 79
- Nowadays more people are choosing to live with friends or alone rather than with their families This trend is likely to have a negative impact on communities What extend do you agree or not agree 72
Those who are argue that, it is not right for animals and unacceptable
Those who argue that, it is not good and unacceptable for animals
flaws:
The essay topic is 'for food and research both', not only for 'research'
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 5.5 out of 9
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 16 15
No. of Words: 282 350
No. of Characters: 1363 1500
No. of Different Words: 138 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.098 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.833 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.561 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 87 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 67 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 42 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 31 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.625 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.294 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.375 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.36 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.522 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.074 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5