Many animal species in the world are becoming extinct nowadays. Some people say that countries and individuals should protect these animals from dying out, while others say that we should concentrate more on problems human beings. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.
We are blessed with the treasure of nature comprising fuel, water, earth, flora and fauna. Presently, animal species are at the low ebb on account of disgraceful activities of human beings. Therefore, some people claim that the prime responsibility of humans is to prevent animals from extinction by offering them safe environment. By contrast, others are more concerned about hardships of human beings. Here, I would like to account for both sides with my own perception.
Numerous points can be put down to shore up the former view. First and foremost, the role of animals to maintain the food c...
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-05-04 | halleybachelor | 70 | view |
- science could help people live up to 100 or 200 years even would that be a good or bad development Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The government should allocate more funds to public services instead of wasting money on arts such as music painting and so on Do you agree or disagree with this statement Give your own opinion 78
- The tendency for human beings to follow one another is shown in the popularity of fashions in clothing and consumer goods. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement. 63
- More and more qualified people are moving from poor to rich countries to fill vacancies in specialist areas like engineering, computing and medicine. Some people believe that by encouraging the movement of such people, rich countries are stealing from poo 75
- Some people believe that children s success in adulthood is related to the way they have been raised by their parents Do you agree or disagree Give your own opinion and examples 82
Comments
offering them safe
offering them safe environment
should it be "a safe environment"?
hunters manage their livelihood by killing to predators
should it be "by killing predators"?
contribution in the financial and health prosperity
should it be "contribution to the financial and health prosperity"?
On the contrary, other's views are conflicting
should it be "on the other hand"?
They think that humans are excellent species on the earth than others
should it be "humans are superior species on the earth than others"?
sorry if I get you wrong...
for sake of man's well being
for the sake of man's well being
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 23 15
No. of Words: 373 350
No. of Characters: 1870 1500
No. of Different Words: 229 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.395 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.013 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.719 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 130 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 101 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 65 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 49 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.217 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.116 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.609 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.243 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.473 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.045 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5