When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
The issue ‘with the development of the technology traditional skills and the conventional life style die’ is a controversial one and needs deeper argument before supporting or opposing the issue. Overall, I disagree with the opinion expressed; I would like to begin by pointing out that ‘traditional skills and ways of life’ are not totally vanished from one country, culture or community because of the introduction of technology.
In many ways, the history of civilization is the history of technology: from the discovery of fire to the invention of the wheel to the development of the Internet we have been moving on from previous ways of doing things. Some technologies, such as weapons of mass destruction, are of negative impact. Others, such as medical advances, positively help people to live better or longer, and so very much help traditional ways of life. Surely, few people would seek to preserve such traditions as living in caves. Technology will always follow it's own footsteps no matter what we , some people think about it. Technology advances because we need it. So there is no way to prevent the advancement of the technology but we should embrace it positively. The generation of a country is responsible to preserve their own custom and tradition and if people feel eager to save a tradition then there is no way technological advancement will destroy it. There are many cases where technology replaces human labor to create certain things for example: hand made sari, which are still popular in many countries. Technology in this case has not destroyed the old tradition but has introduced a faster and less expensive ways to create the same thing.
Interestingly, technology can positively contribute to the keeping alive of traditional skills and ways of life. For example, the populations of some islands are too small to have normal schools. Rather than breaking up families by sending children to the mainland, education authorities have been able to use the Internet to deliver schooling online. In addition, the Internet, and modern refrigeration techniques, is being used to keep alive the traditional skills of producing salmon; it can now be ordered from, and delivered to, anywhere in the world.
In conclusion, without suggesting that all technology is necessarily good, I think it is by no means ‘pointless’, in any way, to try to keep traditions alive with technology. We should not ignore technology, because it can be our friend and support our way of life.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-04-01 | shanimokir | 78 | view |
2019-03-21 | Bharat Goswami | 73 | view |
2019-01-26 | MAD__FOODIEEE | 73 | view |
2019-01-24 | Koragg7 | 84 | view |
2017-09-26 | johnlemon | 73 | view |
- Some people think that it is more effective for student to study in groups while other believe that it is better for them to study alone Discuss both views and give your own opinion 48
- Internet is probably the most significant invention of the last 30 years. Without it, our lives would be completely different.The what extent do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge o 43
- CHEVENING SCHOLARSHIP Your career plan and benefit to your home country Describe your immediate plans upon completion of your Chevening award You should explain your longer term 5 10 year career objectives and describe how your time in the UK will help yo 35
- Families who send their children to private schools should not be required to pay taxes that support the state education system.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 80
- The diagrams below show UK students responses to the question of to what extent would they describe themselves as financially organised Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 88
flaws:
Good arguments but still need better languages.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 410 350
No. of Characters: 2031 1500
No. of Different Words: 215 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.5 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.954 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.881 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 146 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 111 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 83 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 62 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.778 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.295 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.314 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.487 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.143 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5