1.IN MANY WORKPLACES, ONLINE COMMUNICATION IS BECOMING MORE COMMONPLACE THAN FACE-TO-FACE MEETINGS. TO WHAT EXTENT DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE WITH THIS STATEMENT?
Nowadays, organised meetings in many workplaces are conducted online rather than face-to-face communication. I agree with this trend because online conferences are helpful in many ways, especially during pandemics, inflation and escalating pollution.
Initially, the increasing number of online meetups is mainly the result of pandemics. Due to these circumstances, many workers have difficulty reaching destinations and necessary protocols. For instance, people themselves or families who are under quarantine might have a risk to attend meetings. Moreover, recently many successful company meetings delegates are mostly from different places. Therefore inflation and transport charges may adversely affect the people who need to travel long distances. For example, employees from India may need to attend company meetings in other countries like Japan, or America.
Online meetings also have some negative impacts on productivity and workers' coordination and cooperation. To elaborate, active meetings always encourage all the members to encourage and flourish their work and it also able to sustain the relations among the employees. This would in turn reflect on the works and outcomes. However, most of the difficulties would be overcome by the internet technology and video assistance to improve group discussions through various applications like google meet.
Face-to-face meetings are dipped into secondary options in many reputed companies and organizations to inform or gather the workers. In my point of view online or group chat in media are most effective and I strongly believe it is good for everyone.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 394, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...gates are mostly from different places. Therefore inflation and transport charges may adv...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1388.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 239.0 315.596192385 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.80753138075 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01316823085 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.65690376569 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.6951346252 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1428571429 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0714285714 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237655437027 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0763593845976 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0930215409959 0.0667982634062 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160768817174 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117428630283 0.056905535591 206% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.12 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.43 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.