11. Government should invest on teaching science subject rather than other subjects for country to develop and prgress. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The technology advancement is a beneficial trend in modern society. Because of its benefits, many people argue that government should put teaching science subjects on priority rather than the educational content, such as arts and humanities ones. From my perspective, the authority considers disbursement on science without neglect other subjects.
On the one hand, the expenditure on science subjects brings many benefits for the thriving of a nation. Science helps us have an in-depth understanding of everything around us that leads to work effectively and quickly. As a result, the large disbursement on teaching science boost productivity in a lot of majors, such as healthcare quality, economic growth, enormously initiative in biology, and other aspects of life. Moreover, giving preference to science-based subjects improve employee quality in the long-term periods. If science subjects are taught in high school or university, the students, who participate in the workforce market, will become a highly trained educated workforce. That is the driving force that pushes the country forward.
On the other hand, the excessive focus on the education of sciences makes students have comprehensive knowledge. They understand how the machine operation, or its function but can make a presentation about it. That is a lack of knowledge of literature, history, or presentation skill. To become well-rounded persons, studying other subjects besides sciences is indispensable. Furthermore, one country's prosperity has contributed to scientific employment and non-scientific fields. For example, the development in the entertainment industry in Korea has made enormous profits and boosted its economy surpassed other countries that have the same lifetime, besides the small step in technology advancement.
To sum up, the government should fund teaching in science and other educational content, such as arts or history. Both of them are vital factors that lead to the thriving of one country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ience without neglect other subjects. On the one hand, the expenditure on scie...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...small step in technology advancement. To sum up, the government should fund te...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, well, for example, such as, as a result, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.3376753507 276% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1704.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69899665552 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17801082427 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602006688963 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.8385914987 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.235294118 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5882352941 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.70588235294 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275739458439 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0764038035909 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065409528746 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16461803895 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031791303235 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.48 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.