12. Governments should make people responsible for looking after their own local
environment. Do you agree or disagree?
Over the past decades, environmental problem has never ceased to draw public attention and provoke debates. Although governments have been spending magnificence effort to tackle with it, the issue as to whether people should take almost responsibility for their local environment or not remain controversial. From my own perspective this approach would be very shortsighted view following the reason below.
On the one hands, it is important to recognize that the chef culprit of air pollution is the rapid growth of manufactory industry. In fact, the pollutants from industries which are discharged into atmosphere have to be accountable for the reducing of air condition. This problem seem likely too big to individuals to solve, so that, governments should play an irreplaceable role in order to minimizing it. If authorities could control the emission and impose environmental friendly materials into factories, I believe that environmental problems should be addressed in short time.
On the other hand, some may argue that the contribution of residents is also necessary. This argument could be true to some extent because individuals should play significant role toward the safety of environmental by simple actions such as not using the enormous of plastic which would damage natural behaviors, in daily life. Moreover, it is undeniable that gas emission from transportation is one of the producer of carbon dioxide. So that, if people could change their travelling habits, this issue could be more acceptable. For example, in some countries like Japan, people prefer consuming public transport which use eco-friendly energy such as electric or solid rather than private vehicles. As a result, the local air conditions have been significantly improving. This example indicates that the attitude of resident to environmental protecting should never be underestimated.
In conclusion, making people be responsible for environmental problem is paramount important. However, the comprehensive solution needs the combination of both governments and residents as mentioned above
- Some people say modern children games do not develop a wide range of skills while traditional games can be much better for developing such skills To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- 28. Group or team activities can teach more important skills for life than those activities whichare done alone. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 73
- 10. Many countries invest money to prepare competitors to join top competitions like OlympicGame and the World Cup. It is necessary to offer money to encourage children to exercise.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- 12 Governments should make people responsible for looking after their own local environment Do you agree or disagree 88
- 24. Nowadays a large amount of advertising is aimed at children. Some people think this canhave negative effects on children and should be banned. To what extent do you agree ordisagree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 198, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...nce effort to tackle with it, the issue as to whether people should take almost responsibilit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 280, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'seems'.
Suggestion: seems
...reducing of air condition. This problem seem likely too big to individuals to solve,...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, as to, for example, in conclusion, in fact, in short, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1776.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65605095541 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20933160064 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62101910828 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1473031453 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.625 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151334289054 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0479247678495 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578495736389 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110561673117 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461590455363 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.