Taking care of a child is imperative and fathers are contributing more nowadays, whereas, mothers are stepping out and had become a breadwinners earner in the family. This could be majorly because of the mutual understanding and breaking the steretype mentality. In my opinion, it is definately a positive development as it helps to change the convential thinking and gives equal rights to thrive in careers.
To begin with, having a sound relationship and understanding between the couples give them opportunity to take the decision of who will work and the one who has the higher earning potential decides to work and support the increasing family expenses. Most of the developing countries are already following this trend; however, most of the developing nations in Asia are yet to completely accept this phenomenon. In addition, with the changes in social beliefs, more parents are sending their daughters overseas for higher education, and hence this increases the educated women work force in the society, rather than preparing them for marriage. For instance, telemarketing, fashion designing, teaching and banking, women are doing better than men in these fields. Therefore,the more we encourage.
According to my viewpoint, it is not only advantageous, for the society but only beneficial for the personal growth. This trend should be treated as progressive as it gives equal opportunity to the couples to decide who will work out who will stay at home on the basis of their current position and abilities, rather than the gender or traditional beliefs. Moreover, there are similar opportunities for everyone irrespective of the gender, individuals can flourish. Otherwise, it will restrain the growth of the overall community. Therefore, the more we encourage this trend, the better equipped our future will be.
In conclusion, the changing roles in a family is possible due to the mutual concent and alteration in societal beliefs. It is essential to have a continuous growth of individuals and the economy as it eliminates the gender discrimination and advocates the equal rights.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 133, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'breadwinners'' or 'breadwinner's'?
Suggestion: breadwinners'; breadwinner's
...thers are stepping out and had become a breadwinners earner in the family. This could be maj...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 773, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...tter than men in these fields. Therefore,the more we encourage. According to my ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, moreover, so, therefore, whereas, as for, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1771.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3343373494 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03070576876 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572289156627 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.3273185457 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.066666667 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1333333333 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.86666666667 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26842721842 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0722307783632 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521031240329 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138636625071 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0826285756343 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.