53. The use of social media, such as Facebook and Twitter, is replacing face-to-face contact in this century. Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
Nowadays, some social networks are prevailing in communication over the traditional contact. I agree that the demerit of this development will overwhelm the merit in social skills and relationships
On the one hand, the advance technology brings positive effects to daily communication. Firstly, people benefit from the convenience of electrical contact. Thanks to social network such as Google meet, people can contact each other without any physical obstacles; thus the employees are easily accomplished their missions by the virtual assistance of professional buddies, leading to the significant enhancement in cooperation between the conglomerates, producing more products for society. Secondly, people can have new buddies via using social network. If they had a Facebook or Twitter, they could comfortably search for virtual friends since these media platforms provide robust functions to find and match friends easily. Furthermore, the more friends they have, the more opportunities they become close, so these can profoundly share experience that aid people to overcome challenges or detrimental psychology in life. For example, children having virtual buddy can have less chance to get autism than others since they can have friends to share feelings
On the other hand, this technology can trigger negative effects to social relationships. Firstly, people might lack of communication skills if they use social media too much. Those addicted in using these platforms such as students or labors spend more time on chatting and giving comments to posts on Facebook or Twitter of other people instead of using these time in accumulating precious soft skills such as learning English or training for interviewees, they will be facing failed interviewees or earning low income in daily life. Secondly, social media can easily discourage real interactions. By virtual networks, people prefer the virtual relationships due to its fast and convenient, so neglecting true friends and families are usually occurring, triggering the reluctant attitudes when they get an invitation to join particularly environmental activities such as picnic or football which can strengthen social relationships. As a result, they distance themselves from buddies and relatives, breaking the long-established relationship between them.
In conclusion, the disadvantages of this development are outweighing the advantages. I reckon that the consequences of this will cause the lack of social skills and broken acquaintances
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-05 | Pau Nguyen | 84 | view |
| 2021-01-30 | Baonguyenqn3011 | 84 | view |
- Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport Why is it not popular in many places And how to increase its popularity 84
- Students today can easily access information online so libraries are no longer necessary Do you agree or disagree 84
- The older people who need employment have to compete with younger ones What problems can this create What are some solutions 73
- Some people say that all young people should have full time education until they are 18 years old To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 73
- People in many countries have to spend more and more time away from their home Why is this What are the effects on people themselves and their families 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, then, thus, for example, i reckon, in conclusion, in particular, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2138.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 372.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74731182796 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14096770328 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567204301075 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 644.4 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 101.641505083 49.4020404114 206% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 142.533333333 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190401885912 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0728822736333 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050250794816 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142334118391 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519764021502 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.37 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.