the activities of large multinational corporations mostly benefit the economies of developing countries . Other people take the opposite view
It is a common belief that huge global companies help the economies of developing nations. However, some people think that these companies have certain negative impacts on the countries. In my opinion, I believe that the advantages multinationals bring to the countries are more than the disadvantages.
Global corporations have many positive impacts on developing economies. Firstly, they create more job opportunities for local people. This is not all, since they usually have proper training programs for their employees, thus local people have more chances to learn professional knowledge’s, this helps increase the quality of labor for the countries and improve the wages of employees as well. For example, the workers working at high-tech groups such as Intel, IBM in Viet Nam earn approximately 80-100% more than the staff working for local businesses. Secondly, multinationals also contribute more tax to governments. The more they and their employees earn, the more Income tax local governments receive. This is not to mention other types of tax such as Import-export tax, Value add tax, social security tax etc. When the income of the governments increases, they can develop the infrastructure system so that incentive the economies.
However, there are certain negative effects happen when overworld enterprises come. Since they have large-scales productivity system as well as advertise strategy, small local businesses are hard to compete, as a result, many local brands must close. For instance, In Viet Nam Unilever group arrival lead to the death of many native shampoos, soap brands. My parents still mention those brands as sweet memories while young generation have no idea what they are.
In conclusion, while global companies can benefit the economies of developing nations through decreasing unemployment rates and pay more tax to governments, they also threaten local businesses. However, I believe that the advantages are outweigh the disadvantages and governments can regulate more laws to protect local businesses so they can survive.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-12 | sunflower1190 | 73 | view |
| 2020-09-23 | Ngọc Lam | 84 | view |
| 2020-06-18 | Linhthuy0104 | 73 | view |
| 2020-06-18 | Linhthuy0104 | 73 | view |
| 2020-06-18 | Linhthuy0104 | 73 | view |
- Some people say that modern technology has made shopping today easier while others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- line graph discription 11
- the activities of large multinational corporations mostly benefit the economies of developing countries Other people take the opposite view 73
- he diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 238, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'outweighed'.
Suggestion: outweighed
...ever, I believe that the advantages are outweigh the disadvantages and governments can r...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, still, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1755.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53627760252 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98431716339 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558359621451 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 544.5 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9650806569 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.235294118 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6470588235 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1764705882 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10315298684 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0371737043421 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0385992828441 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0705568763922 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.043212225008 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.