Advertising discourages people from being different individuals by making us want to be and to look the same. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is a popular belief that the dearth of uniqueness among modern people can be perfectly exemplified in their outward appearance and consumption of products. Personally, while there are reasons suggesting that this proposition is true, I am completely against it.
On the one hand, it is rational to conclude that in the past the stereotypes of fashion style is often assimilated by culture. Women in the Oriental are required to wear dark clothes that do not show any cleavage, while beard grooming is compulsory among male counterparts. This is partly due to the limited access to the outside world, which does not facilitate exchange of fashion ideas and garment. Moreover, people in modern days are swayed by the styles of celebrities. The iconic hair style of Jennifer Aniston’s character in the TV series “Friends” during the 2000s, is a perfect example of this point.
On the other hand, people might be induced to consume unified products purely due to its inexpensiveness and reparability. The power of advertising is undeniable, as advertising campaigns of multinational companies such as Unilever have been so successful that their products almost dominate the market. Thus, this type of mass-produced goods drives the cost of production down, which leads to the fact that they are sold at a cheaper price than the other less well-known counterparts. Furthermore, replaceable parts for reputed brands like laptops, automobiles or cellphones are abundantly available, so that users can have their devices repaired in case they are out of order.
In conclusion, it is safe to say that the growing similarity in the preference of consumer products among people is due to the goods’ affordability and the influences of celebrities. This tendency, therefore, cannot be attributed to advertisements on all fronts.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-27 | nguyenanhanhanh | 84 | view |
| 2017-04-14 | theresa_trangnguyen | 80 | view |
- Increased world demands for oil and gas have made it necessary to look for these sources of energy in remote untouched natural places Do you think the advantages of locating new sources of energy outweigh the disadvantages of damaging such places 56
- Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people claim that it is acceptable to use animals to medical research for the benefit of human beings while other people argue that it is wrong Discuss both view and give your opinion 84
- Advertising discourages people from being different individuals by making us want to be and to look the same To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport Why is it not popular in many places And how to increase its popularity 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1540.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29209621993 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14787511629 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611683848797 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7594378656 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.461538462 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3846153846 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.23076923077 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0992409339593 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0359118192296 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0420054947908 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0643990261094 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0263164788579 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.