Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The idea that a number of people’s achievement is mostly attributable to luck instead of their own hard work remains a source of controversy. I am highly in favor of the contrast proposition, and assert luck merely is a tiny factor leading to success.
Firstly, it is hard-working that is like the shortest method which leads to achieving success. Specifically, an individual is suggested grasping knowledge in order to enhance their value, one of which is soft skills. For instance, a bachelor’s degree in accountancy is a compulsory entrance condition when you want to apply to an enterprise at a position like accountant, and other competitors certainly outshine you if you don’t possess it. Without knowledge, people cannot attain their goals in whatever they do. As a result, not only do they feel disappointed, but also do not have motivation to attempt.
Secondly, it depends on luck that pushes a growing number of individuals into the passive situation. To elaborate, they don’t know how to adapt to the changes of circumstances, and thus luck, which alone contributes to short-term fortune, is their expectation. In fact, these days, if a person lacks the understanding of Covid-19’s information, he or she could be affected not only their well-being, but also the relatives’. Admittedly, luck also is a noticeable factor generating win, there has long been the lottery. However, participants cannot purely depend on it for the rest of their life to pray that they would be lucky again like the previous equivalent.
In conclusion, for the reason I have mentioned above, I strongly assert that luck is not a key aspect that proves accomplishment, and alone industrious people who pursue their passion till the end are able to easily succeed.
- Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport Why is it not popular in many places And how to increase its popularity 84
- Some people claim that it is acceptable to use animals to medical research for the benefit of human beings while other people argue that it is wrong Discuss both view and give your opinion 56
- An increasing number of advertisements on TV aim at children What are the effects of television advertising on children Should television advertising be controlled 78
- Advertising discourages people from being different individuals by making us want to be and to look the same To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people claim that it is acceptable to use animals to medical research for the benefit of human beings while other people argue that it is wrong Discuss both view and give your opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 14, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... motivation to attempt. Secondly, it is depending on luck that pushes a growing number of...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1473.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09688581315 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06736036495 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626297577855 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3274938497 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.307692308 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2307692308 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46153846154 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169683741971 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0569937046321 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0291483904991 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0962184160972 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333248342112 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.