All cars that burn fossil fuels should be banned and electric cars should replace them. Do you agree or disagree?
It is undeniable fact that emission from automobiles is poisonous and has detrimental effects on the environment. Hence, some people advocate banning combustion engine cars and replacing them with electric ones. Personally, I am in complete agreement with this idea as electric cars are environmentally friendly and cost-effective.
In terms of environment, cars which run on electricity are non-polluted. While petroleum cars release a large quantity of exhaust fumes which are fiendishly destructive to the environment, cars that run on electricity have no such emissions. Accordingly, by imposing a ban on fossil fuel vehicles and encouraging electric cars can act as a way of enhancing the air quality. As an illustration, in Vietnam, about 70% of pollution stems from petrol and diesel automobiles. As a result, increasing the use of vehicles which are electric powered can effectively lessen the air contamination.
Regarding economic efficiency, electric cars are affordable compared to those powered by non-renewable energy. Frankly, the cost of petroleum is relatively high. The key rationale for this is the transport and storing progress of this type of energy is supposed to be complicated and therefore requires a great amount of effort and money. In contrast, supplying cars with electricity is a much more economical option since electricity cost is considerably low. Take Vinfast cars as an example, which are from a famous Vietnamese incorporation, the operating cost of these cars is around five times lower than that of combustion engine cars, considering the gasoline prices in 2022 in Vietnam.
In conclusion, I totally agree with the suggestion of forbidding automobiles and the replacement of electric vehicles.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It is undeniable fact that emission from...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nmentally friendly and cost-effective. In terms of environment, cars which run ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ectively lessen the air contamination. Regarding economic efficiency, electric ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he gasoline prices in 2022 in Vietnam. In conclusion, I totally agree with the ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, frankly, hence, regarding, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1471.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50936329588 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33335437438 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.595505617978 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3085748214 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.071428571 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0714285714 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21428571429 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270333300732 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0932152517132 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0711563288297 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160788614628 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300992686702 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.