All education and healthcare should be funded by the government and free for everyone. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Education and medical care are believed to be indispensable features to socio-economic development in the world. A growing number of people, therefore, hold a belief that these sectors should be wholly funded by national authority. From my perspective, I do not accord with the given statement because this kind of investment will trigger some certain negative consequences.
It cannot be denied that investments in education and healthcare will enrich competitiveness for job opportunities and affordability on treatment. With reference to educational benefits to society, a subsidized education system will facilitate knowledge acquisition and education background for people. This is because finding a job in an economic turmoil is not an easy task and if being equipped with extensive knowledge, graduates will be able to stand out in the pool of candidates for their employment opportunities. In respect of free healthcare, it can save a myriad of lives as symptoms will be recognised, diagnosed and prevented. This is also more beneficial to those who are unlikely to afford health services in light of prohibitive hospitalization fees on treatments especially to critical diseases such as cancer or heart attack. Therefore, a country in which national leaders take medicare and education seriously will put their citizens at ease.
Nonetheless, providing free-of-charge training and medicare services could activate some social and individual drawbacks. Indeed, financial incentives in public health will make people become irresponsible for their own fitness because of easy access to free treatment. Take America as a prime example, people uncontrollably consume a large amount of fast food leading to the highest rate of obesity in the globe. They tend to believe that public hospitals will provide appropriate treatments without paying any fee. With respect to education, the expenses in association with bursaries, tuition, and academic fees covered by the government will significantly affect learners’ perceptiveness. They, indeed, might not appreciate the value of financial rewards created by their solely abilities because tuition fee is reckoned to be made by the state. Consequently, if being inappropriately invested, society will suffer from severe epidemic and shallow-minded individuals.
In conclusion, education and healthcare are the dominant features to sustainable development of a nation. However, I still maintain my original idea that these sectors should not be completely sponsored by the government.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-29 | Tuan Harry | 89 | view |
- Many people around the world use social media to keep in touch with other people and get the news Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowl 89
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the advantages 84
- The number of people who are at risk of serious health problems due to being overweight is increasing What is the reason for the growth in overweight people in society How can this problem be solved 89
- Many people around the world use social media to keep in touch with other people and get the news Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowl 84
- Research indicates that nowadays some consumers are much less influenced by advertising than in the past What do you think are the reasons for this Do you think this is a positive or negative development Give reasons for your answer and include any releva 93
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, if, nonetheless, so, still, therefore, in conclusion, kind of, such as, with reference to, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2164.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 377.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7400530504 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32668508445 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612732095491 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 694.8 506.74238477 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.9214409929 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.222222222 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9444444444 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233939843817 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0683585558277 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447129709272 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142686354174 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464656589778 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.32 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 78.4519038076 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, if, nonetheless, so, still, therefore, in conclusion, kind of, such as, with reference to, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2164.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 377.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7400530504 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32668508445 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612732095491 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 694.8 506.74238477 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.9214409929 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.222222222 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9444444444 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233939843817 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0683585558277 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447129709272 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142686354174 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464656589778 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.32 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 78.4519038076 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.