ALL METHODS USED IN ADVERTISING ARE UNETHICAL AND UNACCEPTABLE IN TODAY’S SOCIETY. TO WHAT EXTENT DO YOU AGREE WITH THIS VIEW?
As the social media is unimaginably developing and prevalent, advertising nowadays has become an indispensable part of people’s lives. Some commercial ads are highly appreciated thanks to their messages conveying humanity, while the others are criticized because of the nuisance they initiated. In my opinion, that advertising approaches have been misled and manipulated is comparatively correct owing to these ensuing reasons.
To begin with, advertising companies have recklessly created unique advertisements in order to expand their market. An American food giant, with a view to introducing appealing yet reasonably priced products to China, has adopted the Orients’ culture by using chopsticks when eating. Nevertheless, the way the actors using meals are not only inexplicable but also inappropriate to the public, which results in the company’s subsequent profitability decline. Besides, a company marketing products designed to bring pleasure to the adults by publicizing an advertisement which context inspired by a famous children movie has gained a great deal of online attraction. Unfortunately, since these posts are not rigorously reviewed on the social networks, curious youngsters may spend time following and searching for the information that are unsuitable for their ages, hence increasing the likelihood of young sexual harassment.
That is not to say those commercial ads do not bring any benefits to some companies. Regarding the small ones, they can acquire a substantial attention from the astounding advertisements, thus elevating the name of the companies in a surprisingly short time. Furthermore, these disreputable marketing methods may help the officials and the lawmakers provide stricter rules in the future to mitigate the appearance of potentially unethical ads.
In conclusion, approaches for promotion have become increasingly unacceptable these days. Companies’ advertisements are suggested to comply with thorough censorship procedures to avoid the eventual disagreement and the loss of reputation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-31 | scorpiothienhat | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-31 | scorpiothienhat | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-02 | bapcai | 75 | view |
| 2021-09-30 | ñeer patel | view | |
| 2021-06-05 | unkownme2020@gmail.com | 84 | view |
- Some people hold that nature places a more important role in people development. However, others believe nurture is the decisive factor. Discuss both views, give opinions. 90
- SOME PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT WE SHOULD LIMIT THE AMOUNT OF VIOLENCE IN MOVIES AND TV PROGRAMMES. HOWEVER, OTHERS BELIEVE THAT VIOLENT CONTENT CAN BRING SOME POSITIVE EFFECTS. DISCUSS BOTH VIEWS AND GIVE YOUR OPINION. 89
- Sending criminals to prison is not the best method of dealing with them. Education and job training are better ways to help them. Do you agree or disagree? 78
- NOWADAYS, ALL OVER THE WORLD, PEOPLE SHARE THE SAME FASHIONS, ADVERTISING, BRANDS, EATING HABITS AND TV CHANNELS SINCE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN COUNTRIES BECOME LESS EVIDENT EACH YEAR. WHAT ARE THE REASONS? DO THE ADVANTAGES OUTWEIGH THE DISADVANTAGES OF THIS? 89
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, hence, may, nevertheless, regarding, so, thus, while, in conclusion, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1773.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.98986486486 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.42290755211 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665540540541 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5216964982 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.384615385 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7692307692 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159620783831 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0517128920025 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399684023449 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.086658116863 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295177708744 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.0946893788 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 50.2224549098 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.76 12.4159519038 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.08 8.58950901804 129% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.