SOME PEOPLE THINK IT’S NECESSARY TO TRAVEL ABROAD TO LEARN ABOUT OTHER COUNTRIES. HOWEVER, OTHER THINK IT’S NOT NECESSARY TO TRAVEL ABROAD BECAUSE ALL OF THE INFORMATION CAN BE SEEN ON TV AND THE INTERNET. DISCUSS BOTH VIEW, OPINION?
With the unimaginably rapid globalization, the demand for travelling around the world and finding out different cultures has grown incessantly in the recent decades. A group of people believe that oversea journeys are comparatively useful whilst others state there is no point in engaging in those trips. In my opinion, travelling to other countries is nothing but a valuable and highly recommended option.
To begin with, it is travelling which brings tremendous benefits for a citizen in the era of global integration. By paying visit to exotic destinations in the world such as the hustle and bustle city of New York or the ancient and tranquil countryside in Kyoto, travelers are able to have both unforgettable experience with their peers and the opportunity to discover and understand the indigenous cultural specialties. This may help travelers better comprehend and adapt to the differences from their cultures. In other words, these worthwhile journeys play the pivotal role in facilitating individuals to become global citizens.
Besides, the more visitors arrive in a country, the more endeavor the local government have to spend on investing in enhancing the quality of customer services and infrastructures. Thanks to the great impression about the privileges and friendliness offered by the host nations, visitors will not only find travelling comfortable and pleasurable, but also have the probability to introduce and invite more friends visiting these countries. This may result in significant promotion in travelling and the images of the destination that can elevate the national stature in the long run.
It would be an overstatement to claim that looking for information on the social media about this fantastic places does not bring any merits. By watching videos or taking advantage of the brand-new virtual-reality technologies, people can easily enjoy the colossal view of the mountainous areas, thereby reducing the considerable amount of time and money required for travelling. Nevertheless, some unique experiences such as taking part in festivals or sampling the native cuisines are obviously limited when people do not directly travel abroad.
In conclusion, it is irrefutable that both travelling and utilizing different means of communication to be well-informed about destinations have their own benefits. However, regardless of the downside like financial burden, physical condition, or time consumption, travelling would bring treasured experience that cannot be merely substituted by technologies.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-04 | lonbimthoi | 100 | view |
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Sending criminals to prison is not the best method of dealing with them. Education and job training are better ways to help them. Do you agree or disagree? 78
- IN MANY COUNTRIES, PEOPLE CAN GET A WIDE VARIETY OF FOOD TODAY AS A RESULT THEY EAT FOOD FROM OTHER REGION THAN THE LOCAL FOOD. DO U THINK THE ADVANTAGES OUTWEIGH THE DISADVANTAGES OF THE DEVELOPMENT. 89
- SOME PEOPLE ARGUE THAT COUNTRIES SHOULD HAVE A MORAL OBLIGATION TO HELP EACH OTHER. ON THE OTHER HAND, SOME PEOPLE THINK THAT A LARGE NUMBER OF AID MONEY DOESN’T REACH THE POOR OF THE WORLD. DISCUSS BOTH VIEW, OPINION? 89
- SOME PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT WE SHOULD LIMIT THE AMOUNT OF VIOLENCE IN MOVIES AND TV PROGRAMMES. HOWEVER, OTHERS BELIEVE THAT VIOLENT CONTENT CAN BRING SOME POSITIVE EFFECTS. DISCUSS BOTH VIEWS AND GIVE YOUR OPINION. 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, so, well, while, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2157.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 383.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6318537859 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20796469761 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 176.041082164 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618798955614 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 681.3 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.3422850274 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.8 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5333333333 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53333333333 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216536205209 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0664535189105 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.036276925398 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111416324553 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0273072427493 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.32 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 78.4519038076 168% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.