Although the prices of fuels have greatly increased over the last decade or two, it is argued that further increases in fuel prices are the only way to reduce world consumption of fuel and lessen pressure on the world’s fuel resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
The human race has entered a completely new stage in its history. With the increasingly rapid economic globalization and urbanization, more problems are brought to our attention. In this day and age, fuel consumption is an issue that numerous people have brought ideas about. The incident is not isolated. Furthermore, disputation as to whether elevating the valuation of fuel with the intention of rendering people to abridge their proclivity on fuel sources has been a highly long-running controversy for a certain period of time now. This essay below will analyze some explanations to this situation as well as its influence on society.
Granted, in our prosperous nation, there is an infrequent possibility to contribute the revolution of the country along with evolving the economy of state without fuel resources. The influx of fuel can spawn greater boons on individual, communal and social levels. As we know, utilization of fuel resources is magnifying at a staggering rate in our fastest growing era on account of massive prevalence and the highly intensive industry of energy sources. In particular, a myriad number of states exploit the fuel resources for the industry as well as elaboration of their country.
Needless to say, an accelerating number of people have a propensity to utilize fuel resources for their miscellaneous intentions including saturating their own automobiles with fuel. It is widely accepted that much inclination on fuel consumption amid communality may carry some drawbacks socially and environmentally. Manifestly, fuel resources lead to global warming, destruction of natural resources, as well as detrimental repercussion on water, air and soil. Additionally, fuel usage not only pose grave environmental threats but also adversely impacts upon public healthy lifestyle.
With the above-presented demonstration, I would like to draw my conclusion as follows. I am adherer to believe that fuel resources are an essential part of our quotidian life and they truly assist a lot to develop the country’s economy. In final analysis, I state that although the issue of diminishing our proclivity on fuel sources is increasing in general curiosity at a staggering rate and might seen insurmountable, it might be mitigated in the foreseeable future by adequate action from both public and authority.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-20 | HappyCandy | 89 | view |
| 2021-11-04 | Phạm Minh Trang | 82 | view |
| 2021-06-21 | haeshit | 78 | view |
| 2021-06-01 | Chinkiarora | 78 | view |
| 2020-03-30 | selenophile | 70 | view |
- Material success and fame are often attributed to some talent Do you think it is possible to get name fame and money even if there is no talent 82
- In many parts of the world there are now more multi generational households e g where grandparents live with parents and children than in the past What do you think are the reasons for this Do you think this is a positive or negative development 14
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today 84
- Some people get into debt by buying things they do not need and cannot afford What are the reasons for this behavior What action can be taken to prevent people from having this problem 78
- Some people regard video games as harmless fun or even as a useful educational tool Others however believe that videos games are having an adverse effect on the people who play them In your opinion do the drawbacks of video games outweigh the benefits 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 332, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
... not isolated. Furthermore, disputation as to whether elevating the valuation of fuel with th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 518, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... long-running controversy for a certain period of time now. This essay below will analyze some...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 401, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[2]
Message: Did you mean 'have seen' or 'see'?
Suggestion: have seen; see
...uriosity at a staggering rate and might seen insurmountable, it might be mitigated i...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, so, well, as to, in general, in particular, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1977.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44628099174 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25274483229 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603305785124 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 639.9 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.5457875293 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.294117647 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3529411765 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11764705882 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273053506924 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0823655835519 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521140678514 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169956848508 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420928579448 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.25 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 78.4519038076 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.