Some people say that school children should be mainly taught about the literature( e.g fiction and poetry) of their own country because it is more important than that of other countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, there are an ongoing controversy regarding whether it is superior for pupils to pursue courses relating to their mother tongue. Although I partly advocate this notion, I would align myself with the opinion that they also need to learn international literatures to ensure a clear future and to be eligible to study in foreign schools.
On the one hand, a vast array of factors has convinced me to support the former perception. Firstly, studying literature of their own nation plays such an integral part in encouraging pupils to love their country. This is because when attending literature courses, students are capable of gaining a deeper insight into the facets of their nation’s culture such as traditional costumes or activities. Therefore, they become more aware of their accountability with the development of their country. Furthermore, being taught about the literature of their own nation enables school children to get used to using their mother tongue effectively. To illustrate, in Vietnam, at many educational institutions, students are able to deepen their knowledge relating to some aspects of Vietnamese such as grammatical structures or vocabulary. It may lead to the fact that they can apply these lessons into their real life to interact with others.
On the other hand, there are a host of justifications persuading me to concede that studying other literatures is quite fundamental. The first reason stems from the fact that in this modern civilization, children knowing other languages could have clear career paths in years to come. For example, currently, numerous prestigious organizations in Vietnam are inclined to use IELTS qualification as a criterian to recruite employees. Thereby, school juveniles knowing how to use lingual francas tend to be employed for high-paid occupations. Moreover, devoting more focus to other literatures would be quite useful for students who have a desire to study abroad. This could be perfectly exemplified by the fact that Vietnamese pupils are required to have TOEFT or IELTS certificates if they want to pursue courses in a great number of reputable universities in the world like Havard or Cambridge. Hence, getting accustomed to using the languages of other nations can help school juveniles to approach to better studying environment.
In conclusion, explicitly, it is indisputable that placing emphasis on the literature of their own country could have some auspicious effects on the future life of children; nevertheless, I want to affirm that it is necessary for them to allocate more endeavors to other languages. Besides that, from my perspective, schools ought to creat a conducive environment that can foster the abilities of children in terms of using their mother tongue and other lingual francas.
- The diagram shows the development of a particular area between 1995 to the present day 11
- The map below show the information about the change of Riverage college 30 years ago and now 73
- The map below show the information about the change of Riverage college 30 years ago and now 67
- Some people think that people who choose a job early and keep doing more likely to get a satisfying career life than those who frequently change jobs To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The diagrams below show the coastal village of Seaville in 1980 and 2010 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 32, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'hosts'?
Suggestion: hosts
...others. On the other hand, there are a host of justifications persuading me to conc...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 24.0651302605 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 74.0 41.998997996 176% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2356.0 1615.20841683 146% => OK
No of words: 439.0 315.596192385 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36674259681 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0151710187 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 176.041082164 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546697038724 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 745.2 506.74238477 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5084791341 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.888888889 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3888888889 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.11111111111 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218545045286 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0678143371383 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0567264588813 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130545558288 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0592948126205 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 78.4519038076 170% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.