Some people think that the best way to increase road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving cars or riding motorbikes. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, there is a contentious controversy about whether increasing the minumum legitimate age for driving is the most effective method to enhance road safety. Although some experts acknowledge that this way might be most efficient, I would concur with the opinion that there are other methods which play an integral part in helping to increase traffic safety.
On the one hand, a plethora of justifications has prevailed many individuals to advocate the former way. The first reason stems from the fact that when becoming older, transport users might be more mature and bear onus in terms of obeying traffic instructions. This can be perfectly exemplified by the fact that Vietnamese drivers aged over 18 years old are inclined to respect traffic rules such as stopping moving when the light is red or reducing velocity when the light turns to yellow. Utimately , the frequency and possibility of accidents would be diminished. Furthermore, drivers aged over the minimum age for using means of transport might have accumulated a great deal of experience in tackling problems with their vehicles. To illustrate, an over-20-year-old truck user could know exactly what he needs to do and how to control the vehicle when the brake is out of work. Accordingly, he is more likely not to cause tragic accidents.
On the other hand, there are some other methods which could be as effective as increasing minimum legal age. Firstly, authorities need to impose higher fines for those violating the traffic rules. For example, Vietnamese government has implemented some policies relating to the increase in the amount of fines that transport drivers have to pay if they use vehicles after driking. Therefore, in order not to lavish too much money, people are gradually prone to follow the rules and the number of accidents has dropped substantially. Moreover, another feasible method that needs to be considered is that governments need to require their citizens to attend traffic courses if they want to use means of transport. This is because when joining in these classes, people are given an opportunity to acquire a thorough comprehension of skills and knowledge needed for driving. Eventually, individuals can not only become aware the magnitude of following traffic rules but also be competent to deal with problems when using vehicles.
To recapitulate, explicitly, it is indisputable that in creasing the minium legitimate age for driving might have a great number of auspicious affects on helping to improve the road safety; Nevertheless, I want to affirm that other methods ought to be taken into account.
- The graph below shows the production of three forest industry products in a European country namely timber pulp and paper from 1980 to 2000 56
- Technologies have changed the way children spend their free time Do you think the advantages outweight the disadvatages 78
- More and more people are becoming seriously overweight Some people think a solution can be to increase the price of fattening foods To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The best way to reduce youth crimes is to educate their parents with parental skills To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some think that people are responsible for their happiness Others feel that happiness depends on other factors in their life Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 500, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...hen the light turns to yellow. Utimately , the frequency and possibility of accide...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, for example, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2192.0 1615.20841683 136% => OK
No of words: 421.0 315.596192385 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20665083135 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87867782343 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553444180523 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 693.0 506.74238477 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6372320767 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.941176471 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7647058824 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.94117647059 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170455637749 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0546477186176 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570348754818 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110255517963 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393252143382 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.